Posted on

Many are interested in events of Jan. 6

Many are interested in events of Jan. 6

To the Editor:

I recently read a Letter to the Editor from Kevin Kimpel, in which they said that the January 6th Hearings are “not important.” They are important. What happened on January 6th was unprecedented. That means it hasn’t happened before. We need to have an investigation into what led to the events of that day.

While I won’t reiterate the content of the hearings I will say this, January 6th was an attempted coup by the Republican Party.

Because of this, there are a lot of denials, disinterest and disinformation surrounding the day. That is why we need indictments, investigations and real jail time for the people who tried to destroy the foundations of our democracy.

Kevin Kimpel, you may not be interested, and I won’t speculate as to the reasons for that. But I will say that I am interested and so are those who want the freedom to vote.

Victoria Woods

Angola

Posted on

The Old Guy: On the events of Jan. 6, 2021, and why we won’t forget them. Ever.

silive’s Logo

As I write this, it’s exactly a year since the infamous Jan. 6 insurrection at our nation’s capital. Rioters stormed the gates of the Capitol Building, some thinking they were invading the White House.

About 2,000 people surrounded the Capitol Building as it was rushed, although there were many thousands more supporters of the former president in the city at that point. They had come for a rally, curiously held on the same day that the Congress was set to validate the results of the latest election, which the former president had lost.

The former president was not in a good mood. He told the people at the rally that they were going to march up Pennsylvania Avenue (which he said he loved) and take back control of their government. Obviously, folks listening to him thought that their government had been stolen, the election results misreported and they were still listening to the president of the United States.

They weren’t. Joe Biden had won the presidency by seven million votes. The election took place in the middle of a worldwide pandemic. More people voted than in any previous election. The election process was not only watched, it was investigated down to the last vote. Although some people cried widespread election fraud when their candidate lost, the truth was there wasn’t evidence found of any. Some people had attempted fraud, but they were caught. They had voted for the former president… twice. The Supreme Court threw out every one of his claims of fraud for lack of evidence.

In the ensuing attack, five people were killed, more than 100 were injured and four security guards later took their own lives. That always struck me as curious. What were they told about their future career opportunities/life expectancy that would make them see suicide as their only way out?

There’s a drawback to all the technology that we now possess. The drawback is, it’s everywhere. In every British crime-related show, there are references to CCTV, which are outdoor security cameras.

The people invading the Capitol were seen by such cameras. To make matters worse, many of them were “live streaming” during the break in, one woman even hyping her real estate firm with an address and contact information. It wasn’t hard to track her down.

It wasn’t that difficult to find most of the leading characters of that day. The “shaman,” “podium guy” and about a dozen others were soon found, charged and sentenced. Of course, they all protested their arrests. They said they had gone to the Capitol Building at the invitation of the former president, who, although he told the crowd that he would be walking with them, was instead watching the entire spectacle on TV, safe and secure. So secure that he didn’t have to be whisked off to a safer location like every member of Congress, including Mike Pence.

Ahh…Mike Pence. One of the rioters had thoughtfully constructed a gallows to hang Mike Pence from for disobeying the command of the former president to void the election. The fact that he had refused was supposedly confidential, yet the crowd breaking into the Capitol knew it instantly. They also knew what back doors were unlocked and could be entered. Supposedly, some of them had been given a tour of the Capitol Building the day before, allegedly by some members of Congress.

I found it odd that people carrying banners bearing the names of the former president and vice president would then become a lynch mob looking to murder the vice president. Kind of self-defeating, no? Like telling your followers not to take a vaccine that could save their lives?

All of this madness seemed to be predicated on the “fact” that the former president had actually won the election and that the current president was somehow a poser that had fooled the entire country into thinking he had won.

The truth of the matter is that he did win and the former president now appears to be a big crybaby who refuses to understand how he lost this time because he’s always managed to get away with scamming people before. But, as the once revered President Lincoln used to say, you can’t fool all of the people all of the time. Eventually you run out of luck or lies or street cred, and then what do you do?

Now, the question is: will people higher up on the food chain pay for their actions during the insurrection? The answer is no, of course they won’t. A former president had been given a choice as to whether to indict another former president of the opposite party for war crimes. He declined to do so because his legal team said he only had a 50-50 chance of winning the case and would not be able to simultaneously enact some important legislation. That president went for progress rather than politics.

And it will happen this time, too. There’s too much going on to pursue this matter to its logical extent. By the time all the charges are filed, the case decided, the sentence ready to be carried out, the current president’s term will be over and the subject of his investigations might just be president again.

But, even though we were told earlier on in his administration that we shouldn’t believe what we saw with our own eyes, we did watch the events of that day. Horrified or galvanized, each of us sat there and watched. We saw what went on. We knew who the guilty parties involved were and what they tried to do to overturn our democracy.

And we won’t forget it. Ever.

Keep the faith. Justice is a long road.

Comment on Facebook at “Talk To The Old Guy.”

Posted on

Top GOP lawmaker won’t condemn calling events of Jan. 6 ‘legitimate political discourse’

Top GOP lawmaker won't condemn calling events of Jan. 6 'legitimate political discourse'

Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, refused to condemn a censure resolution targeting two Republican colleagues, Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, which ​included a statement suggesting that the events of Jan. 6 were “legitimate political discourse​.”

The RNC issued the formal censure for the lawmakers’ roles on the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

“My understanding is [the statement] pertains to the legitimate protesters that I saw that day,” McCaul told ABC “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz on Sunday.

Raddatz pressed McCaul, noting that the “legitimate political discourse” line is still in the resolution, encompassing events that occurred throughout the entire day when some supporters of President Donald Trump assaulted the Capitol in an effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Although McCaul steered clear of condoning any acts of violence or criminality that eventually led to hundreds of arrests, he remained unwilling to denounce his party’s resolution.

“I condemn the violence at the Capitol. And those who committed criminal offenses who were violent at the Capitol need to be prosecuted,” he said, adding, “And I’ve said that all along, that that needs to be addressed.”

Last November, the Texas congressman earned the endorsement of Trump heading into the 2022 midterm election cycle. McCaul had voted against the second impeachment of the former president in the wake of the Jan. 6 riot.

The lawmaker said he thinks there’s a view within the GOP that Democrats are “politicizing” and pursuing the “weaponization” of Jan. 6. but that “the truth needs to come out, you know, with respect to this.”

“Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger crossed a line. They chose to join Nancy Pelosi in a Democrat-led persecution of ordinary citizens who engaged in legitimate political discourse that had nothing to do with violence at the Capitol. That’s why Republican National Committee members and myself overwhelmingly support this resolution,” RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel said in a statement after the vote.

Once more, Raddatz pressed: “I just want to ask you this again, do you stand by the RNC’s actions and statements?”

“As I understand it, they’re referring to the peaceful protesters when they said that. I do not agree with that statement if it’s applied to those who committed criminal offenses and violence to overtake our shrine of democracy,” McCaul qualified.

While McCaul would not say whether he agrees with the decision to censure his colleagues, he did encourage party unity.

“Should they have been censured?” Raddatz pressed.

“You know, that’s — that was a — I’m not a member of the RNC,” McCaul responded. “I wasn’t privy to the resolution.”

“I can tell you, from a messaging standpoint, the Republicans need to unify,” McCaul said, adding, “What are we going to do for the country to get the majority back in Congress? To get the White House back in 2024?”

On Thursday, the ranking Republican member on the House Foreign Affairs Committee moderated a classified briefing on Capitol Hill led by Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin as Russia continues to build up its military presence around Ukraine.

“Did you come away thinking it was certain that Russia would invade?” Raddatz asked.

“You know, I would say, the conditions are there,” McCaul said. “It’s more likely than not. I think the noose is being prepared. It’s around Ukraine right now as we speak.”

President Joe Biden ordered 3,00 U.S. troop deployments to Eastern Europe on Wednesday to reassure NATO allies amid the standoff with Russia over Ukraine.

But McCaul criticized the Biden administration’s approach, saying he believes an invasion of Ukraine “emboldens and it empowers Putin” and that the U.S. isn’t doing an adequate job of deterring such a move.

“The deterrence has not been there and deterrence is key,” McCaul said.

McCaul said he is working with a bipartisan group of senators that appears to be closing in on a deal that would impose crippling sanctions on Russia for its hostilities against Ukraine.

“I’m working with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on a bill that we hope to get out this week that will stand up the deterrence where the administration has failed to provide not only the lethal aid to Ukraine but also the sanctions necessary, devastating sanctions, including Nord Stream 2. That is the biggest leverage — that energy pipeline that President Biden gave him in Europe,” McCaul said.

“How does this end? If — if they invade and you put those sanctions on, how does he respond?” Raddatz asked. “Where does this go from here? And you have a huge refugee crisis.”

McCaul responded that “at the end of the day” we’re going to see a “resistance movement in Ukraine.”

“That’s why we’re sending them sniper rifles, ammunition. Remember, the majority of Ukraine is not pro-Russia anymore. Unlike before Crimea, they don’t like Russia, and there’s a resistance movement there,” McCaul said.