Posted on

All 3 Law & Order Shows Unite in Giant Crossover Event – E! Online

All 3 Law & Order Shows Unite in Giant Crossover Event - E! Online

Prepare for the crossover event of the season.

NBC announced Aug. 24 that there will be a historic three-hour Law & Order crossover event on Sept. 22 that will see characters from across the franchise working together on a case. The night will kick off with Law & Order: Organized Crime, which will lead into Law & Order: Special Victims Unit, before coming to an end with Law & Order

The crossover will see Mariska Hargitay‘s Capt. Olivia Benson, Christopher Melonis Det. Elliot Stabler, Jeffrey Donovan‘s Det. Frank Cosgrove, Mehcad Brooks‘ Det. Jalen Shaw, Sam Waterston‘s Jack McCoy and Hugh Dancy‘s ADA Nolan Price team up to figure out what happened after a mysterious young girl who is shot in cold blood. 

Benson and Stabler are called to work on the case after Cosgrove and Shaw “realize they have more than a typical homicide case on their hands,” according to NBC. “After uncovering key evidence, Jack McCoy (Waterston) and ADA Nolan Price (Dancy) seek justice against an international crime ring,” the teaser continues, “but complications threaten the outcome of their case.”

Posted on

New regulations on the Anti-Corruption Law is published | Perspectives & Events | Mayer Brown

Lexology Getting the Deal Through — Oil Regulation 2022 | Perspectives & Events | Mayer Brown

Last Tuesday July 12, 2022, the Brazilian Federal Government published Decree No. 11,129/22 (“Decree“), which regulates Law No. 12,846 of August 1, 2013 (“Anti-Corruption Law“).

The new decree revokes Decree No. 8,420 of March 18, 2015 and amends the regulations on the anticorruption legislation in force, by improving the procedures related to the preliminary investigation, the Administrative Liability Proceeding (PAR) and, most importantly, the negotiation, execution and fulfillment of leniency agreements, ensuring greater legal certainty, predictability and attractiveness of such institutes for the legal entities. According to the decree, the main purposes of the leniency agreements will now be to (a) increase the investigative capacity of the public administration; (b) enhance the authorities’ capacity to recover assets; and (c) promote a culture of integrity within the private sector.

Moreover, the decree establishes new rules that expand the prerogatives of the Office of the Comptroller General of the Union (CGU) in the scope of the liability proceedings against legal entities. The referred rules reinforce the promotion of an integrity culture in the private sector and seek to address the legal uncertainties that existed in the Brazilian anticorruption microsystem.

Among the new provisions introduced by the decree we have: changes in the calculation of penalties (including a change in the percentage reduction of the penalty for legal entities that have an effective integrity program in place); review of the methodology used to measure the undue advantage earned by corporate offenders for purposes of establishing the applicable penalty; changes to the timeframes for interruption or suspension of the statute of limitations; provision for joint action by different agencies to execute leniency agreements; imposition of limits on the exchange of information and documents obtained under a leniency agreement with other authorities; and inclusion of new requirements for renegotiation and amendment of the obligations undertaken in the agreements.

The decree also introduced a provision for indirect monitoring by the CGU of the obligations to adopt, implement and improve the integrity program, which suggests a will of the authorities to increase the inclusion of independent corporate monitors as a condition for the execution of leniency agreements under the supervision of the CGU. The topic was not formally regulated in Brazil so far, although we have seen some practical examples of the imposition of independent monitors by legal entities that have executed leniency agreements.

Among the main changes introduced by the decree, we highlight the following:

Preliminary Investigation and Administrative Liability Proceeding – PAR

  1. Improvement of the preliminary investigation procedure, which aims the verification of evidence of authorship and materiality of harmful acts against the public administration. The new term for the conclusion of the procedure by the competent authority will be up to 180 (one hundred and eighty) days, with the possibility of extension of such term. The new measures include the possibility of sharing information and documents with the competent authorities, as well as the application of judicial measures deemed necessary for the investigation (e.g., searches and seizures);
  2. Detailing of the procedures to be observed while conducting PARs, especially with regard to subpoenas, indictments, and elaboration of the respective final report. Furthermore, foreign legal entities may be subpoenaed and notified of all procedural acts regardless of power of attorney or contractual or bylaws provisions.
  3. The agencies and entities of the direct and indirect federal public administration can be held liable if they fail to inform the CGU of evidence of damaging acts against a foreign public administration, identified in the course of their duties.
  4. The decree also establishes that violations of the Anti-Corruption Law and that may also represent administrative violations of Law No. 14,133/2021 (“New Public Bidding Law“) or other related laws shall be investigated simultaneously in the same PAR proceeding.
  5. The provisions of the decree immediately apply to the proceedings in course and the procedural acts undertaken before it becomes enforceable remain valid.

Fine for Unlawful Acts

  1. Improvement of the criteria for determining the applicable penalty, including changes in the calculation methods for the respective amounts and in the percentages of the calculation bases of such penalty.
  2. Increase from 4% to 5% of the reduction percentage of the penalty, in case the legal entity proves that an effective integrity program was in place at the time of the Anti-Corruption Law violation. The increase of the reduction percentage sends a clear message on the importance of implementing an effective integrity program.
  3. Improvement of the definition of “obtained or intended advantage”, which now corresponds to the monetary equivalent of the product of the illicit act, i.e., the earnings or profits obtained or intended by the legal entity as a direct or indirect result of the harmful act.
  4. Inclusion of new methodologies for estimating the obtained or intended advantage, which include the use of the amount of the (a) revenue obtained in the scope of administrative agreements and their amendments, minus licit costs; (b) expenses or costs avoided by the legal entity, including tax or regulatory expenses; or (c) additional profit earned by the legal entity as a result of an action or omission from the public administration that would not have occurred without the harmful act.

Leniency Agreements

  1. The leniency agreements may provide for a different deadline from the one established by the decree (i.e., 30 days) for payment of the applicable penalty or any other financial obligation imposed on the legal entity.
  2. The main purposes of leniency agreements are now (a) to increase the investigative capacity of the public administration; (b) to enhance the authorities’ capacity to recover assets; and (c) to promote an integrity culture of integrity in the private sector.
  3. Preparation of a joint act by the CGU and the Office of the Federal Attorney General (AGU) to regulate the joint action of those entities in the negotiation, execution and monitoring of leniency agreements. The joint action of the CGU and AGU was previously regulated by an Ordinance and by the Technical Cooperation Agreement between CGU, AGU, the Federal Court of Accounts (TCU) and the Ministry of Justice and Public Security (MJSP), executed in 2020.
  4. The CGU may accept the prerogative to negotiate, execute and monitor the fulfillment of leniency agreements related to harmful acts against other government and federative entities.
  5. Inclusion of two new requirements for the execution of leniency agreements: (a) full compensation of the uncontroversial amount of the damage and (b) loss, in favor of the damaged entity or the Federal Union, of the amounts corresponding to the undue asset increase or illicit enrichment obtained with the violation.
  6. In cases where the unlawful act simultaneously implies in damage to the public entity and undue asset increase to the legal entity (provided that they are identical), the corresponding amounts will be calculated (a) in a lump sum for purposes of quantification of the amount to be paid under the leniency agreement and (b) registered as compensation for damages for accounting and budgetary purposes and for their destination to the public entity.
  7. The signing of the memorandum of understanding with the legal entity that is negotiating the leniency agreement will interrupt and suspend the statute of limitations for the negotiation period, limited, in any case, to 360 days. Furthermore, the PAR filed against the a legal entity may also be suspended;
  8. The CGU may take over the records of administrative proceedings in progress in other federal public administration agencies or entities related to the facts subject to the leniency agreement under negotiation.
  9. The negotiation of a leniency agreement will not interfere in the regular progress of specific administrative proceedings for the investigation of damages and losses to the federal public administration resulting from a harmful act committed by a legal entity, with or without the participation of a public agent.
  10. Provision of new clauses that may be included in the leniency agreement and that address (a) deadlines and monitoring of the implementation of integrity program improvement measures; (b) payment of the penalty and of the uncontroversial amount of the damages; and (c) possibility of using such amount to compensate amounts established in other sanction or liability proceedings, when related to the same facts included in the scope of the agreement.
  11. Provision for monitoring the obligations of adopting, implementing, and improving the integrity program, which may be carried out directly or indirectly by the CGU including the possibility of imposing independent monitorship.
  12. Inclusion of new criteria to be considered when defining the percentage reduction of the applicable penalty, such as the (a) timing of the self-reporting and the unprecedentedness of the harmful acts; (b) effectiveness of the collaboration of the legal entity; and (c) commitment to undertake relevant conditions to comply with the agreement.
  13. The information and documents obtained as a result of the leniency agreements may be shared with other authorities, upon commitment not to use them to sanction the legal entity with regard to the same facts that were the object of the leniency agreement, or upon the approval of the legal entity itself.
  14. The execution of the leniency agreement will interrupt the statute of limitations with regard to the unlawful acts that are subject of the agreement, which will remain suspended until the fulfillment of the commitments undertaken in the agreement or its termination.
  15. The benefits of exemption from the extraordinary publication of the administrative decision, the prohibition to receive incentives, subsidies, grants, donations or loans from public agencies or entities and public financial institutions or those controlled by the Public Administration, as well as the reduction of the final amount of the penalty and the exemption or mitigation of administrative sanctions will be granted to legal entities from the date of execution of the leniency agreement, and no longer from the date of its fulfilment.
  16. Inclusion new rules and improvement of the existing ones regarding breach, termination and amendments to the leniency agreements.

Integrity Program

  1. Improvement of the evaluation parameters of the existence and application of integrity programs, as well as exclusion of the former parameter of “transparency of the legal entity regarding donations to candidates and political parties”, in line with the ruling of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) regarding the unconstitutionality of political donations made by companies and of Law No. 13,165/2015 (“Electoral Reform Law“), which ratified the STF’s ruling.
  2. Among the improvements of the evaluation parameters, we highlight the need to (a) demonstrate the senior management’s commitment by providing adequate resources to the integrity program; (b) conduct adequate risk management including periodic risk analysis and effective allocation of resources; (c) conduct due diligence for hiring and monitoring third parties, politically exposed persons (PEP) and people related to them, and for granting donations and sponsorships.
  3. Inclusion of new criteria for analyzing the parameters for evaluation of the existence and application of integrity programs (e.g., the legal entity’s gross revenue and its corporate governance structure).

Other Provisions

  1. Amendments to the laws on the publication of information regarding administrative sanctions imposed on individuals or legal entities that imply a restriction to the right to participate in public bids or to execute agreements with the public administration of any federative sphere in the National Registry of Ineligible and Suspended Companies (CEIS).
  2. Possibility of including, in the CEIS or in the National Register of Punished Companies (CNEP), information regarding the scope of the sanction.
  3. Exclusion of the data contained in the CEIS or CNEP after the fulfillment of the penalty of extraordinary publication of the administrative decision.
  4. Inclusion of new attributions of the Minister of CGU to issue complementary guidelines, rules and procedures for ensuring the effectiveness of the decree, especially with regard to the methodology for calculating gross revenues and the taxes to be excluded for purposes of calculating fines and evaluating the integrity program, including the method for simplified evaluation in the case of micro and small companies; and
  5. The Ministry of Justice and Public Security, AGU and CGU will create institutional communication channels for the submission of information regarding the practice of unlawful acts against the national or foreign public administration or resulting from plea agreements and leniency agreements, as well as for international cooperation and asset recovery.

The decree, which will come into force on July 18, 2022, will revoke Decree No. 8,420/2015.

If you are interested in reading the complete decree, please visit:

http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2019-2022/2022/Decreto/D11129.htm

 

Posted on

Safety challenges law enforcement face during 4th of July events

Safety challenges law enforcement face during 4th of July events

CLAWSON, Mich. (WXYZ) — As the nation reels from the tragedy in Highland Park, Illinois Monday, cities across metro Detroit are continuing their July 4th celebrations with heavy hearts and a heightened sense of alert.

From Clawson to Northville, it’s been a day full of activity in metro Detroit. From parades in the morning, to carnivals and fireworks in the evening, everyone is ready to celebrate the Fourth of July.

But in the wake of the tragic shooting just hours earlier in a Chicago suburb, there’s inevitably concern across the country. While law enforcement is prepared, open events pose a challenge.

“The problem is when you have an open venue like that at a carnival for example or a parade, you don’t have fixed points of entry,” said former FBI Supervisory Special Agent Andy Bartnowak, who previously worked in the Detroit field office.

Bartnowak has worked security for multiple major events in metro Detroit, such as the World Series, NCAA Final Four and the MLB All Star games. However, he says events like parades are challenging to secure.

“The bottom line is when you’re having a lot of people in one location and you’re not having a security point for them to enter, it makes it that more difficult,” Bartnowak said. “There’s no way you can really stop everybody and check everybody. So if somebody wants to come in there and cause… chaos and have a shooting, a mass shooting, it’s very difficult to stop.”

At their Fourth of July celebration, Clawson police was fully staffed with help from Michigan State Police, the Oakland County Sheriff’s Department and a handful of local agencies who were all hoping to keep concerns at bay and make sure the day is celebrated as safe as possible.

“I think the most we as citizens can do is be situationally aware,” Bartnowak said. “Situational awareness is nothing more than being aware of your surroundings… If you see something that doesn’t look right to you, there’s a reason it probably doesn’t look right and that’s when you go and alert security or law enforcement.”

Posted on

China Changes Law So It Can Hit Back at Insults at Sports Events – BNN Bloomberg

IOC Says No Ceremony If Russian Skater Valieva Medals in Event - BNN Bloomberg

(Bloomberg) — Chinese lawmakers approved a change to the law that would allow it to fight back at any perceived insult at international sporting events, underscoring the lengths President Xi Jinping’s government will go to protect China’s reputation abroad.

The Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on Friday passed the revision to the Law on Physical Culture and Sports to allow for countermeasures if any country, region or organization undermines the nation’s sovereignty, security, development interests or dignity in international sports events, according to full texts of the revised law released by official Xinhua News Agency.

There are no details on what constitutes an infringement of rights or dignity. The revised law will take effect on Jan. 1, 2023.

The ruling Communist Party has a history of sternly responding to the slightest criticism, whether about close ties with Russia after the invasion of Ukraine or the government’s activities in the far western region of Xinjiang, where it’s been accused of human rights abuses. 

Last month, when World Health Organization chief Tedros Ghebreyesus said China’s zero-tolerance Covid strategy was not “sustainable,” a Foreign Ministry spokesman immediately hit back, saying “the relevant individual” should “try to get a better understanding of the facts and refrain from making irresponsible remarks.”

The government’s hypersensitive defense of its policies also involves the sports world. After Boston Celtics player Enes Kanter made statements in support of Tibet last year, internet giant Tencent Holdings Ltd. removed all live-streaming for the National Basketball Association team’s games.

In 2019, a tweet by Houston Rockets General Manager Daryl Morey in support of pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong prompted state broadcaster China Central Television to suspend showing NBA contests for about a year.

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

Posted on

Mid-Missouri law enforcement agencies to host prescription drug take back events – ABC17NEWS

The Drug Enforcement Agency will hold its 22nd National Prescription Drug Take Back Day on Saturday, April 30, 2022. Take back events are scheduled to happen across Mid-Missouri.

BOONE COUNTY, Mo. (KMIZ)

Mid-Missouri law enforcement agencies will join a nationwide effort to collect expired, unused, or unwanted prescription drugs.

The Boone County Sheriff’s Office will partner with police departments from Ashland, Columbia, Centralia, Hallsville, the University of Missouri, and Truman VA Hospital for events at several locations.

On Friday, law enforcement officers will collect medications at two locations in Boone County from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.

  • Harry S. Truman VA Hospital, 800 Hospital Dr., Columbia, Missouri
  • University of Missouri, MU Student Center, 901 Rollins Rd., Columbia, Missouri

Five other collection sites are scheduled for Saturday from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.

  • Ashland Police Department, 101 W. Broadway, Ashland, Missouri
  • Centralia Police Department lobby, 114 S. Rollins St., Centralia, Missouri
  • Hallsville Police Department, 202 Highway 124 E., Hallsville, Missouri
  • Hickman High School (north entrance), 1104 N. Providence Rd., Columbia, Missouri
  • Rock Bridge High School (north entrance), 4303 S. Providence Rd., Columbia, Missouri

Deputies said the events are designed to keep the medications from being abused and to protect the environment. Some medications pose a risk to water systems if flushed.

The Boonville Fire and Police Departments plan to host a take back event Saturday from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.

  • Boonville Fire Department, 500 Bingham Rd., Boonville, Missouri

Anyone unable to attend the event can drop their medications off at the Police Department on East Morgan Street any time before the event.

In Jefferson City, the police department will hold a take back event Saturday from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.

  • Jefferson City Police Department, 401 Monroe St., Jefferson City, Missouri

Law enforcement officers do ask anyone dropping off medications to not bring liquid medications or needs.

The events are part of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s 22nd National Prescription Drug Take Back Day.

Nearly 37,200 pounds of medications were collected in October during the last take back events, according to the DEA’s St. Louis Division. That includes Missouri, Kansas, and parts of Illinois.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates more than 106,000 people died from overdoses between Nov. 2020 to Nov. 2021. Opioid-related deaths accounted for 75% of all overdose deaths, according to the CDC.

Posted on

SUPPLEMENTARY ISSUE – China’s Top 10 Copyright Events in 2021

SUPPLEMENTARY ISSUE - China’s Top 10 Copyright Events in 2021

Recently, China’s Top 10 Copyright Events in 2021 were selected and released by the National Copyright Administration of China (NCAC).

1. Newly amended Copyright Law Coming into  Effect

The Third Amendment to Copyright Law came into effect on June 1, 2021, which was a milestone event of China’s copyright development. In response to the new demands of economic and social development and emerging expectations of the public, the amendment followed the principles of protecting rights, encouraging creation, promoting dissemination and balancing interests. The amendment improved copyright legal system, strengthened copyright protection, brought the Copyright Law in harmony with other laws, and helped implement the obligations provided for in the international copyright treaties China had joined in recent years. The amendment would serve as an important legal support for maintaining copyright order, increasing copyright governance effectiveness and promoting the prosperous development of socialist culture and science.

2.Marrakesh Treaty Ratified by NPC Standing Committee

The Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired, or Otherwise Print Disabled, the world’s first and only copyright treaty to include a clear human rights perspective, was ratified on October 23, 2021 by the Standing Committee of the 13th National People’s Congress (NPC) at its 31st Session. The treaty’s ratification could better safeguard the cultural rights and interests of people with print disabilities in China by enabling them to equally appreciate works and receive education, thus facilitating the universal access to cultural achievements. Furthermore, it also created favorable conditions for providing works in accessible format to print-disabled people outside China and further expanding the overseas coverage of excellent Chinese works.

3. Judicial Protection of Copyright Strengthened

The Amendment (XI) to Criminal Law came into effect on March 1, 2021. In the Amendment, criminal protection was introduced for rights of communication through information network and performers’ rights, and the upper limit of statutory penalties for two crimes involving copyright infringement was raised to 10 years’ imprisonment for copyright infringement and 5 years’ imprisonment for selling infringing copies. On March 3, 2021, the Interpretation on the Application of Punitive Damages in Civil Cases of Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights was issued by the Supreme People’s Court to guide local courts to accurately apply punitive damages and punish serious infringements of intellectual property rights. The implementations of the Amendment and judicial interpretation are of great significance for maintaining copyright order by further strengthening the judicial protection of copyright.

4. Copyright Work Plan for 14th FYP Period Released by NCAC

The Sixth Plenary Session of the 19th CPC Central Committee incorporated into its resolution strengthening the creation, protection and utilization of intellectual property rights, reflecting the Party’s great emphasis on intellectual property development. In order to fully implement the guiding principles from General Secretary Xi Jinping’s major speech on intellectual property work and conscientiously put in place The Outline of National Intellectual Property Strategy (2021–2035) and The National Plan for Intellectual Property Protection and Utilization during the 14th Five-Year Plan (FYP) Period, NCAC strengthened the top-level design of copyright work and released The Copyright Work Plan for the 14th FYP Period on December 24, 2021, which sets out the guiding thought, basic principles, development goals and key tasks for copyright work during the 14th FYP period. This has provided important copyright support for comprehensively implementing the Party Central Committee’s major plans on intellectual property work, and building China into a country strong in innovation, culture and intellectual property.

5. Copyright Enforcement and Supervision Focused on New Business Models and New Sectors

In 2021, copyright law enforcement and supervision authorities actively responded to copyright challenges in new business models and new sectors, and explored new methods and paths for copyright protection. NCAC Copyright Department, in cooperation with relevant authorities, launched a focused campaign to combat theatrical movies piracy and dissemination and strengthened social governance mechanism for the copyright protection of theatrical movies. NCAC and other authorities launched the “Jianwang 2021” Campaign, which prioritized copyright protection in short video, live webcast and sports events, and included Tokyo Olympic Games programs in the 2021 pre-warning list of copyright protection for key works. The 2021 National Conference on Copyright Protection and Development in Digital Environment focused on the latest issues of copyright protection and development, showcased the achievements of copyright protection and promoted the development of copyright industries.

6. Copyright Market Order of Digital Music Industry Maintained

In July 2021, the State Administration for Market Regulation issued an administrative penalty decision against Tencent Holdings Ltd., ordering Tencent and its affiliated companies to restore market competition by terminating exclusive license of music copyright  within 30 days, discontinuing the payment of copyright fees such as high prepayments, and not demanding of upstream copyright holders conditions that give competitive advantage without reasonable grounds. The decision would help reshape the competition order by providing all players with opportunities to compete fairly in relevant market. NCAC had been promoting the healthy and orderly development of digital music industry by guiding all parties to improve the copyright licensing model, build good market ecology, effectively resolve copyright disputes through negotiation and mediation, and refocus their copyright operation on encouraging originality and improving user experience.

7. Copyright Market Order of Karaoke Industry Regulated

The Notice on Regulating Copyright Market Order of Karaoke Industry was released by NCAC together with the Ministry of Culture and Tourism on April 2, 2021. The notice provides for eight measures to regulate collective management in karaoke industry, such as clearing copyright through collective management, and implementing a two-in-one copyright licensing mechanism. The notice, as an important step to further supervise and improve copyright collective management, is of great significance for protecting the legitimate rights and interests of right holders, and facilitating the legitimate use of copyrighted contents and the healthy development of the industry.

8. The 8th China International Copyright Expo Held in Hangzhou

The 8th China International Copyright Expo was successfully held in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province in October 2021, with over ten side events including the presentation of WIPO-NCAC Copyright Awards. The Expo fully remonstrated the achievements of China’s copyright endeavors and served as an important platform for copyrighted works exhibition, copyright exchange and trade. During the Expo, the Exhibition Marking the 30th Anniversary of the Implementation of the Copyright Law was organized by NCAC to celebrate the centenary of the founding of the Communist Party of China. The exhibition comprehensively reviewed the significant achievements in copyright legislation, protection, industry development and international exchange and cooperation in the past 30 years under the leadership of the Party.

9. Wujiang Model of Copyright Protection Promoted Worldwide

On October 16, 2021, the plaque awarding ceremony of WIPO Case Study of Best Practice in Copyright Protection for Wujiang Silk Industry & the book release ceremony of Copyright as an Enabler for the Growth of Silk Industry: A Study of Copyright Protection and High-quality Development of Silk Industry took place in Hangzhou, marking a successful conclusion of the case study. After “Nantong Model” and “Dehua Model”, the “Wujiang Model” of enabling the growth the silk and textile industry through copyright protection is another example of increasing China’s international influence of copyright administration and contributing China’s share to improving global copyright governance. WIPO values this case study a lot and promotes the study results worldwide through its channels.

10. Verdict Announced for Copyright Infringement Case of Renren Yingshi Subtitle Group

The first instance verdict was announced for the case of Liang Yongping’s alleged copyright infringement during the public hearing by the Shanghai No. 3 Intermediate People’s Court on November 22, 2021. According to the verdict, the defendant Liang Yongping was convicted of copyright infringement and sentenced to three years and six months in prison and a fine of 1.5 million yuan, with the illegal proceeds recovered and the impounded property that had been used for the crime confiscated. The verdict that holds Renren Yingshi Subtitle Group criminally liable clarified the nature of subtitle groups’ translation of film and TV works, and demonstrated China’s determination to combat copyright infringement and piracy and strengthen copyright protection.

http://english.ipraction.gov.cn/article/ns/202204/374785.html

Posted on

Latest Special Events Law overhaul needs more work, input from police chief and fire marshal, councilman says

Latest Special Events Law overhaul needs more work, input from police chief and fire marshal, councilman says

A pending overhaul of Riverhead Town’s special events law that would substantially reduce regulatory requirements for event promoters, is going back to the drawing board.

The proposed amendments, the subject of a town board public hearing last week, would slash the time town officials would have to review and approve special event applications and drastically reduce the amount and type of information required to be provided by event promoters in their permit applications.

“It’s still a work in progress,” Councilman Tim Hubbard said in a phone interview Tuesday.

The revisions were developed last year by a Riverhead Business Advisory subcommittee, an effort led by then-president of the Riverhead Chamber of Commerce Bob Kern, entertainment venue operator and event/festival producer Dean Del Prete, (Cousins Paint Ball, Long Island Sports Park), and event planner Monique Parsons, co-owner of North Fork Event Company. The trio presented the proposal to the town board at its July 1 work session.

Hubbard said the Riverhead Fire Marshal was not involved in developing the pending draft revisions and, after last week’s public hearing, raised concerns about some of the changes proposed. Hubbard said the police chief has also raised some concerns.

Riverhead Fire Marshal Craig Zitek did not return a phone call seeking comment.

“Some of the time frames are too short,” Police Chief David Hegermiller said in an interview today. He said he and the fire marshal were not involved in the proposed revision and weren’t given copies of the proposed law prior to the hearing.

“I just saw [the proposal] and only had time to go through it quickly,” he said. Hegermiller said he’d be sitting down with Fire Marshal Craig Zitek to review the proposed amendments.

“I don’t even know who did it,” Hegermiller said. “But we should have been a part of it. The committee should have been more balanced,” he said.

“The purpose of this law as far as we’re concerned is to make sure we have a safe event,” the chief said.

The draft revision adds a “Purpose and Intent” to the Special Events law that doesn’t mention public safety, but speaks only of promoting economic development and cultural tourism, “to generate foot-traffic and attract tourists and patrons.”

That’s all well and good, the chief said, but “the overreaching goal is that we ensure public safety.”

Hubbard, one of the two town board liaisons to the town’s code revision committee, agreed.

“The fire marshal was part of this when we did it in 2018,” Hubbard said, referring to a code revision process that culminated in amendments adopted in December 2018. “When the business advisory [committee] redid it, they submitted their final revision to the board and everybody around got it, except for, apparently, the fire marshal.”

The Greater Jamesport Civic Association, in written comments submitted to the town board in advance of the April 5 hearing, called the proposal “unduly risky and an abrogation of the Town’s responsibilities.” It also questioned “whether the sponsor of the proposal conferred with and sought input from the Police, Fire Marshall and Code Enforcement agencies.”

The proposed amendments would place event attendees and the surrounding community at increased safety risk, according to the civic association said in the letter. It expressed specific opposition to the elimination of existing application requirements, including site plans, fire safety plans and parking details.

“It won’t be put up for a vote anytime soon, certainly not at the next meeting,” Hubbard said Tuesday.

Members of the business community and others involved in event planning and production in Riverhead had been extremely critical of the December 2018 amendment of the special events code. The 2018 amendments established much longer deadlines for special event permit applications, increased application fees and imposed late fees for applications that don’t meet the deadlines.

The 2018 revisions came after discussions of the burden on town staff resources caused by an increasing number of special events in Riverhead — especially during peak summer months — as well as the traffic impacts on town roadways.

Various town departments are responsible for reviewing different aspects of special event permit applications prior to town board approval of the permit, including the town clerk, town attorney and fire marshal’s offices and the police department. Staff members told the town board during work session discussions that the permit application deadlines in the existing town code did not leave adequate time for review.

The special events code in effect in 2018 was largely unchanged from its original form when it was enacted in December 2003. It set application deadlines (and other requirements) based on the size of the event being proposed. For events expected to draw fewer than 1,000 attendees, applications were required to be filed at least 40 days in advance of the event date. Events expected to draw 1,000 to 4,999 attendees were required to have applications filed 120 days prior to the event. Those expected to draw more than 5,000 attendees had to have applications filed “at least” 180 days prior to the event.

The December 2018 revisions lengthened the lead times for town staff review and also adjusted the spectator numbers. The change established a 90-day lead time for events expected to draw up to 750 attendees, a 180-day lead time for events expected to draw 751 to 2,500 attendees, and a 270-day lead time for events expected to draw more than 2,500 attendees.

The 2018 revisions included a new section that allowed the town to consider “possible conflicts with other events and seasonal demands which may overtax or cause an undue burden on town services” when deciding whether to approve or deny an event application.

The 2018 revisions also: required the applicant to submit a certificate of insurance to the town clerk 30 days prior to the commencement of the event; pay a nonrefundable application fee; established a late application fee of $20 per day beyond the submission deadline; established a fee for amending the permit application equal to 25% of the application fee; and increased the penalties for failure to obtain a special event permit.

The 2018 amendments did not provide for a transition period, so some event sponsors planning events in 2019 found themselves unable to meet the filing deadlines contained in the new law. After complaints from those sponsors, the town board in April 2019 adopted an “amnesty” provision, delaying the effective date of the 2018 revisions to June 18, 2019. In August 2019, the board again extended the amnesty period to Dec. 18, 2019.

During that amnesty period, town officials, with input from the Business Advisory Committee, set about to amend the code again.

The town board on Dec. 17, 2019 adopted a new set of sweeping revisions to the Special Events code that rolled back some of the changes made a year earlier.

It increased the thresholds for “large” and “mass” gathering events, which are subject to more regulation. It also shortened the lead times for applications adopted a year earlier, reducing the lead time for large gathering special events (1,001-4,000 attendees) from 180 days to 120 days and reducing the lead time for mass gathering events from 270 days to 180 days.)

The board also eliminated the $20 per day late fee, changed the application amendment fee from 25% of the original application fee to a flat fee of $150, and deleted the new provision that established “possible conflicts with other events and seasonal demands” as a potential ground for denial of a permit.

The 2019 amendments also revised or entirely deleted a host of special events law provisions that had been in effect since its adoption in 2003.

The current set of proposed amendments seeks to simplify and streamline the application process even more and ease restrictions on event producers.

Kern, who was elected to the town board in November and took office Jan. 1, spoke out at the hearing in support of the need for further amendment of the law.

“Even though it’s been amended, I can tell you that it’s still more onerous than other towns,” Kern said.

“I think people have this fear that this is Back then in their neighborhoods, most of these larger events don’t take place anywhere near anybody’s homes,” he said.

“The economic development benefit is incredible to businesses in this town — and also, we compete with other towns in terms of events,” Kern said.

“In addition, I’ll say this, the town square is going to be a hangout if it’s not activated every single weekend with events,” Kern said. “We need to be friendly to the people that produce events, and be welcoming to people that want to bring events to our town,” he said.

The proposed revisions shorten the lead times required for applications that were adopted in the last two revisions. The lead time required for small gathering events (100-1,000 attendees), which was increased from 40 days to 90 days in 2018 (and left unchanged in 2019), would be reduced to 45 days. The lead time for “large gathering” events (1,001-4,000 attendees) increased in 2018 from 120 days (set in 2003) to 180 days and rolled back to 120 days in 2019, would now be reduced to 60 days. The lead time for “mass gathering” events, which was increased from 180 days (set in 2003) to 270 days in 2018, then reset to 180 days in 2019, would be reduced to 90 days under the proposed amendments.

While the existing code states that applications filed within 45 days of a “small gathering” event or within 60 days of a large or mass gathering event will be denied, the proposed revisions allow allowed the applications to be filed five to 15 days beyond the new application deadlines upon the payment of a late fee (to be determined by town board resolution.) This means that “small gathering” event applicants could file 40 days before the event date, “large gathering” applicants could file 45 days prior to the event date, and “mass gathering” applicants could file 75 days before the event date.

The proposed amendments would eliminate application requirements for:

  • a plan and drawing, drawn to scale, showing the property where the event will be held and the locations of proposed stage, tents, exhibition areas, vendor areas, spectator seating areas, fire extinguishers and temporary utilities;
  • a parking are plan showing means of ingress and egress as well as a minimum number of one parking space for every four people expected to attend, and compliance with the fire marshal’s setback guidelines;
  • an environmental impact study;
  • the name, address and phone number of people who will sell alcoholic beverages at the event;
  • a copy of the State Liquor Authority permit(s) for the sale of alcoholic beverages at the event;
  • a plan for the use of live music, loudspeakers, showing type and location of speakers and other audio equipment;
  • a description of fire protection and a map specifying the location fire lanes and water supply for fire control, subject to the approval of the Riverhead Fire Marshal and fire department chief;
  • a description of tents or other temporary structures and a plan showing the intended number and placement, compliance with the requirements of the National Fire Protection Association Life Safety Code, NFPA requirements for tents, and the N.Y. State fire code;
  • a communications plan for command and control of all routine and emergency activities related to the event subject to the approval of the chief of police and the Riverhead Fire Marshal;
  • information about animals and animal handling at special events, including the handling, storage and disposal of animal wastes;
  • information about the nature of the event and activities to be carried on at the event, the admission fee, if any, to be charged, and the name of the group, organization, charity or individuals to benefit from the proceeds of the event;
  • a nonrefundable administration fee for any application not accompanied by a certificate of public liability insurance.

Kern said at the hearing that things were left out of the code “not on purpose” — including a sitemap requirement a hold harmless requirement, and a public safety plan, which he said must be submitted with the application.

“It was just a slip-up and is now back into the code,” Kern said. “Maybe a couple other minor things.”

Jamesport resident Barbara Blass, who was a member of the town board when the 2003 Special Events law was adopted, said the town should not eliminate the need for environmental assessment of all special event plans. “I do believe a short-form EAF should be required for all special event permits,” Blass said.

“There’s a statement in the code that says the town board will assess whether the event impacts general health, safety and welfare of the town as identified through SEQRA [the State Environmental Quality Review Act] pursuant to Part 617,” Blass said, referring to state regulations pertaining to environmental quality review. “And I wonder how you get there, if you don’t have an environmental assessment form to evaluate.”

Blass also pointed out that the hearing notice contained an inaccurate reference to the name of Chapter 255, “Parades, Assemblies and Special Events.” The notice said the hearing was about amendments to “Parades and Assemblies,” which is the name of Article I of Chapter 255. Article II is titled “Special Events,” and the bulk of the revisions in the proposed amendments affect the Special Events law, which is Article II.

“I’m sure it was not intentional,” Blass said at the hearing.

“It wasn’t intentional,” Supervisor Yvette Aguiar replied. “A parade is a special event,” she said. “Let’s just go forward we got that. It was to address 255 and that was the title, they left something out. We got it. We’ll move forward. Thank you.”

Blass said afterward she raised the question because a lot of residents are interested in the regulation of special events and might not have realized from the way the hearing notice was written that it had anything to do with special events, since it only mentioned parades and assemblies. “I think it was a little misleading,” she said.

The survival of local journalism depends on your support.
We are a small family-owned operation. You rely on us to stay informed, and we depend on you to make our work possible. Just a few dollars can help us continue to bring this important service to our community.
Support RiverheadLOCAL today.

Posted on

A couple public events hosted by UBCO next week

A couple public events hosted by UBCO next week

UBC Okanagan’s first Climate/Justice teach-in will take place on Tuesday.

Part of the university’s Climate Action Plan, approved in December, the tech-in will consist of two sessions. The first will feature concurrent panels of faculty members tackling complex, interconnected climate and justice issues and their solutions.

The second session will begin with a panel of UBCO staff introducing the newly launched Climate Action Plan, and participants will be asked to share their views and suggestions for achieving action on climate change at UBCO.

The event from 6 to 8 p.m. is free and open to everyone. Advanced registration is required at ubc.zoom.us/meeting/register/u5cvcuGsrj4oH90PbMla3JyxJqMcAmCYi18K

——

Was Prime Minister Justin Trudeau justified in using the Emergencies Act to quell protests in Ottawa?

That’s the question that will be up for debate at UBC Okanagan’s annual Roger Watts debate on Wednesday.

Student debaters will argue their case before a panel of local judges who will then decide the winners.

Prizes of $1,000 will be awarded to first place, while runners-up will win $500.

There will also be a People’s Choice Award, with $500 up for grabs.

The event will begin at 5:30 p.m. The public is invited to watch it online using Zoom.

To register, visit epp.ok.ubc.ca/about/roger-watts-debate.