Posted on

More than 60 agencies made requests for City funding for events

More than 60 agencies made requests for City funding for events

However, the City was only able to accept a certain number of applicants through its civic fund.

The City turned down nearly half of the applicants who requested subsidizing from Ottawa’s Civic Fund to help pay for their community events.

According to a memo sent out by Donna Grey, general manager of community and social services to city council on Thursday, June 23, the City received applications from 62 agencies through an open call for proposals that was launched on May 16.

Altogether, the amount of money requested was $172,000.

However, the City only has $65,000 allocated through its civic fund, so only 37 applications made the cut.

On September 25, 2019, city council approved the new community funding framework.

Included under the new framework was funding for civic events, which will be used to deliver family-friend events in local communities and neighbourhoods.

This funding envelope includes $65,000 of annual funding, allocated to a maximum of $3,000 per event.

The purpose of civic events, the Grey said, is to fund events that:

  • Promote neighbours meeting neighbours in their local, geographic community;
  • Include multiple activities, family entertainment and attractions;
  • Appeal to residents in a specific geographic neighbourhood/district or ward;
  • Promote community well-being by welcoming all community members; and
  • Promote equity and inclusion.

The call for proposals was directed toward small community organizations hosting one-to-two-day community events.

The City of Ottawa Allocations Committee reviewed every applicator and provided a rating based on the organization’s alignment with the goals of the community funding, the goals and objectives of the event, the financial position of the organization and the viabilities of the event budget.

Once the ranking was done, further adjustments to ranking were made to reflect the equity lens which include, but was not limited to, priority groups, priority neighbourhoods, service areas, wards and whether resources are being targeted and aligned to areas of the city facing the greatest needs or greatest inequities, Grey explained.

Gray added that community agencies have been notified of the results of the allocation process.

A full list of successful agencies approved for funding is available online.

Posted on

PGA Tour denies golfers’ waiver requests to play Saudi-backed LIV Golf league event in London

PGA Tour denies golfers' waiver requests to play Saudi-backed LIV Golf league event in London

In a surprising decision by the PGA Tour this week, golfers who sought permission to play in the first LIV Golf Invitational Series tournament have been denied their waiver requests. It is unknown at this time whether any PGA Tour players will risk punishment by going ahead with participation in the event at the Centurion Club in London from June 9-11.

“We have notified those who have applied that their request has been declined in accordance with the PGA TOUR Tournament Regulations. As such, TOUR members are not authorized to participate in the Saudi Golf League’s London event under our Regulations,” said PGA Tour senior vice president Tyler Dennis in a memo to players. “As a membership organization, we believe this decision is in the best interest of the PGA TOUR and its players.”

The belief was that the PGA Tour, which must grant permission to its members to play in events outside the PGA Tour itself, would approve the waivers for the first of eight LIV Golf events this year before denying them at a later date when the league moved to North American turf. Instead, PGA Tour commissioner Jay Monahan has laid down the law early, denying his membership the ability to participate in the big-money events from the jump.

This is slightly unusual. Many golfers, including Phil Mickelson, Bubba Watson, Bryson DeChambeau and Dustin Johnson were granted waivers earlier this year to play in the Saudi International, which is an event on the Asian Tour. However, the PGA Tour sees this LIV Golf Invitational series differently, ostensibly because it is not a one-off event but the beginning of a rival league. The PGA Tour only allows players three waiver requests a year.

If players choose to defy those denied waivers and play the event anyway, Monahan has consistently maintained in private that players could be suspended and permanently banned from the PGA Tour.

“Our PGA Tour rules and regulations were written by the players, for the players,” said Monahan at the Players Championship earlier this year, implying that suspensions and bans would hold up in a court of law. “They’ve been in existence for over 50 years. I’m confident in our rules and regulations, my ability to administer them, and that’s my position on the matter. … We’re confident in our position, and we’re going to keep moving forward as a PGA Tour and focus on the things that we control.”

PGA Tour players who either requested waiver releases or were linked with the league include Lee Westwood, Sergio Garcia, Jason Kokrak, Kevin Na and Robert Garrigus. Then there’s Mickelson, of course, who is by far the biggest name involved, seemingly the linchpin for the entire thing and will undoubtedly end up being the poster boy in a court of law for how this all shakes out.

LIV Golf is a Saudi Arabia-financed league that is laboring to create an alternative golf tour while luring some of the top players in the world to its events. It was reported that Phil Mickelson helped write the operating agreement for the league before he disappeared from public view following some controversial comments about the folks running the league he allegedly helped start. The 48-golfer, 12-team LIV Golf events — five of which are slated to be played in the United States later this year — will have purses of $20 million, including a $5 million payout to the top team at each event.

Greg Norman, who is currently serving as the CEO of LIV Golf, has been adamant that legally-speaking golfers — who are considered independent contractors — could not be banned from the PGA Tour. The Tour obviously sees that differently. While this waiver denial is certainly surprising for the first event — the PGA Tour grants waivers all the time to events not held on North American soil — this was always going to come to a head at some point later on when the leagues clashed with conflicting events on the same dates in the United States.

This entire saga has been one that would likely head to court since the day it began. Now, it seems that is likely to happen sooner than originally thought.