Posted on

No adverse booster shot events found in LTC residents; vaccines potent against omicron, studies reveal

No adverse booster shot events found in LTC residents; vaccines potent against omicron, studies reveal



A study across 239 Genesis HealthCare nursing homes has found no evidence of adverse reactions to COVID-19 booster shots among residents. The news arrives alongside results from two new studies showing current booster efficacy against the omicron variant.

Investigators from Brown University and Genesis compared rates of adverse events between nursing home residents who had received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine booster dose and their peers who had yet to receive a booster. The primary mRNA vaccine series was delivered at least six months before Sept. 22, 2021 and participants’ third booster doses were given between that date and February 2, 2022.  

“No safety signals were detected,” in a 14-day post-vaccination period, reported veteran nursing home researcher Vincent Mor Ph.D., and colleagues.

Quick immune response

Another study, published Thursday in the journal Nature, may help answer the question of how effective these boosters are against omicron. Study participants given three doses of an mRNA vaccine were able to quickly produce antibodies against the variant, researchers from The Rockefeller University in New York reported. 

“These data help explain why a third dose of a vaccine that was not specifically designed to protect against variants is effective against variant-induced serious disease,” they wrote.

A cohort study published Friday, meanwhile, has found a “persisting and robust” immune response to omicron mutations in patients with different vaccination histories. 

“The results mean that both vaccination and previous infection with COVID-19 likely prevent severe illness and death from the omicron strain,” reported the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy.

Related articles:

Third Pfizer booster dose has mild side effects

Posted on

Third doses of COVID-19 vaccines not associated with increase in reports of serious adverse events: study

Third doses of COVID-19 vaccines not associated with increase in reports of serious adverse events: study

A new study looking at data concerning around 48,000 people in the U.S. has found that third doses of mRNA vaccine, such as those from Pfizer or Moderna, are safe and did not cause any increase in reporting of serious adverse events.

The study, published in the journal JAMA Network Open on Thursday, found that third doses did not result in an increase in severe adverse events compared to earlier doses, but did come with an increase in low-severity adverse events, such as fatigue and nausea.

“Results from this cohort study suggest that a third dose of the same type of vaccination after a BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 primary series is associated with safe outcomes,” the study stated.

The COVID-19 vaccines produced by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna were originally designed as two-dose regimes, supported by extensive clinical trials. As studies showed evidence of waning vaccine immunity, health experts began to suggest booster shots, which were found to be safe and effective. But there is still less data on these third doses than on the first and second doses, a gap in knowledge that researchers were hoping to close in this new study. 

Researchers accessed electronic medical records provided by 47,999 adults within the Mayo Clinic Enterprise, a non-profit hospital system in the U.S., all of whom who were vaccinated with three doses of the same mRNA COVID-19 vaccines between December 2020 and Oct. 17, 2021.

Around 38,000 participants received the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine for their three doses, while around 9,900 received the Moderna vaccine.

There were more than twice the amount of immunosuppressed individuals in the group who received Moderna than in the group that received Pfizer. No adverse events specific to a certain brand was reported in the study.

The most common adverse events after receiving the third dose were fatigue, the temporary swelling of lymph nodes, nausea and headache, with these symptoms reported by around two to five per cent of participants.

Less than two per cent of participants reported other common side effects such as joint pain, muscle aches, diarrhea and fever.

These numbers, while still small, represented a significant increase in how often these same participants had reported these side effects after their first or second dose.

After the third dose, two patients had anaphylaxis, four patients had a swelling of tissue around the heart called pericarditis and one patient reported myocarditis, meaning only 0.01 per cent of participants reported one of these serious adverse events.

“Reporting of severe adverse events was rare after the third dose and was not significantly increased compared with the frequency of reporting after the second dose,” the study stated.

Researchers also monitored emergency department visits for participants within two days of receiving each dose of the vaccine, and found that there was an increase in emergency department visits after a third dose of the Pfizer vaccine compared to the second. Overall, 0.29 per cent of people visited the emergency department after a third dose versus 0.2 per cent after the second dose.

There was no difference in ER visits for different doses for those receiving Moderna.

The overall results indicate that third doses are indeed safe, as they don’t come with an increase in severe adverse events, researchers said. They added that third doses had a better safety profile in this study than receiving a single dose did.

“Individuals who received exactly [one] dose of an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine had greater increases in incidence of adverse events after dose [one], compared with baseline, than what was observed in the [three]-dose cohort,” the study stated.

Researchers noted that there are limitations to the study, such as the fact that people receiving mixed brands were not included and that those receiving third doses are more likely to be older and immunosuppressed, thus potentially having a reduced immune reaction to the vaccine that could show less adverse effects.

Further studies into third doses will hopefully be able to flesh out more on the safety profile of mixing vaccine brands to further narrow down how frequent rare adverse events are, the study stated. 

Posted on

COVID-19 Vaccines Not Tied to Immune-Mediated Neurological Events

COVID-19 Vaccines Not Tied to Immune-Mediated Neurological Events

MONDAY, March 21, 2022 (HealthDay News) — No safety signal is observed between COVID-19 vaccines and immune-mediated neurological events, but infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is associated with increased risks for Bell palsy, encephalomyelitis, and Guillain-Barré syndrome, according to a study published online March 16 in The BMJ.

Xintong Li, from the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom, and colleagues examined the association between COVID-19 vaccines, SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the risk for immune-mediated neurological events in a population-based historical rate comparison study. Data were included from 8,330,497 people in the United Kingdom and Spain who received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccines: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, or Ad.26.COV2.S. The study sample also included 735,870 unvaccinated individuals with a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test result for SARS-CoV-2 and 14,330,080 individuals from the general population.

The researchers found that for Bell palsy, encephalomyelitis, and Guillain-Barré syndrome, postvaccination rates were consistent with expected rates. In a self-controlled case series conducted for Bell palsy, there were no safety signals seen for vaccinated individuals. However, the rates were higher than expected after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Using data from the United Kingdom, the standardized incidence ratios were 1.33, 6.89, and 3.53 for Bell palsy, encephalomyelitis, and Guillain-Barré syndrome, respectively. Transverse myelitis was rare and could not be analyzed.

“In line with our findings, several other studies have also reported increased risks of immune-mediated neurological events after SARS-CoV-2 infection,” the authors write.

One author disclosed financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

Abstract/Full Text

Editorial