Posted on

Cancer Care Events & Support Groups

Mindful Meditation

Third Wednesday of each month 12:10 – 12:50 p.m.

MercyOne Richard Deming Cancer Center

411 Laurel Street; Suite 3300, Des Moines, IA 50314

Conference Room

Free of charge

This is a drop-in group intended for cancer patients and survivors and their families. If you have questions, please email kylie.cooper@commonspirit.org.

Living with Cancer Support Group

Last Monday of each month 5:00 – 6:00 p.m.

MercyOne Richard Deming Cancer Center

411 Laurel Street, Suite 3300, Des Moines, IA 50314

Conference Room or join us virtually via Zoom

Free of charge

Registration is required. Please call our office at 515-643-8206 or email nscalco@mercydesmoines.org to register. Zoom link will be sent a few days prior.

Caregiver Connection and Support

Third Tuesday of each month 5:00 – 6:00 p.m.

MercyOne Richard Deming Cancer Center

411 Laurel Street; Suite 3300, Des Moines, IA 50314

Conference Room

Free of charge

Registration is required. Please contact Kathy Koenig at kathy@caregiverconnection.net to register.

Being with Art Together

New audio program presented by the Des Moines Art Center

4700 Grand Avenue, Des Moines, IA

Hours: Tues–Wed 11 a.m. – 4 p.m. | Thur–Fri 11 a.m. –7 p.m. | Sat–Sun 10 a.m. – 4 p.m.

Please contact Mia Buch for more information and collaborative events with area cancer centers. 515-271-0349 or mbuch@desmoinesartcenter.org.

Posted on

Beau’s Brewery 5K for Ovarian Cancer Canada back as a live event this Saturday, June 25

Beau’s Brewery 5K for Ovarian Cancer Canada back as a live event this Saturday, June 25

The roads around Beau’s Brewery in Vankleek Hill will be busy this Saturday (June 25), with the 5K for Ovarian Cancer Canada back as an in-person event for the first time since 2019.

Held in 2020 and 2021 as a virtual run, the 5K for Ovarian Cancer Canada still raised  a total of $53,000 in 2021, bringing the total to more than $250,000 raised since the first run was held in 2015. The 2022 event is combining what worked well virtually, with a return to in-person participation.

The Beau’s 5K for Ovarian Cancer Canada is inspired by Vankleek Hill’s Ashley Courtois (Cowan), whose friends and family started this race when Ashley was diagnosed with the disease in 2015. The event started small but grew each year during Ashley’s three-year battle with ovarian cancer. Ashley lost her battle with cancer in 2018, but the race continues to be held in honour of her wonderful strength and spirit, and her love of running.

The Beau’s 5K is a walk or run event, with distances of 3K, 5K or 10K. Entry fee is a $40 tax-deductible donation to Ovarian Cancer Canada.

The 3K and 5K course is an out-and back on Newton Road, starting from and returning to the brewery. The road is a scenic rural route, a gravel road past farms and homes in Vankleek Hill.  The course is basically flat, save a small hill at the finish line. The 10K course is simply a double out-and-back, for those who want the extra challenge.

More information on this year’s Beau’s 5K for Ovarian Cancer Canada can be found here.

Posted on

St. Elizabeth to observe National Cancer Survivors Day Monday, host events throughout June

St. Elizabeth to observe National Cancer Survivors Day Monday, host events throughout June

Cancer in Northern Kentucky and the Greater Cincinnati area affects thousands each year, with an estimated 30,000 Kentuckians, 73,000 Ohioans, and 39,000 Hoosiers facing a cancer diagnosis in 2022 — numbers far above the national average. While the numbers are staggering, thanks to education, awareness, medical advances, and an emphasis on prevention and screening, more and more people are surviving every day.

On Monday, June 6, St. Elizabeth Healthcare will observe National Cancer Survivors Day (June 5) by honoring cancer survivors and their supporters. The annual event of solidarity with cancer survivors around the world raises awareness of the ongoing challenges they face and – most importantly – celebrates their lives.

St. Elizabeth Healthcare will host events all month honoring the courage, strength, and resiliency of those affected by cancer, including:

• Weekly classes on aromatherapy, yoga, healthy cooking, and art therapy.

• Giveaways on June 6 for survivors — including ribbon pins, buttons, flower seeds, bracelets, and cookies. In addition, a beautiful quilt has been donated and entries will be received throughout the day for one survivor.

• Festive banners and ribbons displayed throughout the St. Elizabeth Cancer Center.

Thanks to major advances in cancer prevention, early detection, and targeted treatments, many patients are living longer with cancer. According to the American Cancer Society, there are more than 43 million cancer survivors worldwide. “Everyone knows someone whose life has been touched by cancer,” says Dwinelva Z. Zackery, Director of Integrative Oncology for St. Elizabeth Healthcare.

Cancer survivors face many ongoing challenges. “Each day, our oncology teams work to improve cancer care, help reduce the incidence of cancer and guide patients through survivorship,” says Zackery. “We’re right here to help as survivors navigate their journey.”

St. Elizabeth offers survivorship planning to all patients facing a cancer diagnosis. Visit stelizabeth.com/mycancer to learn more.

St. Elizabeth Healthcare

Posted on

630 CHED supports Kids With Cancer Society Meet & Greet – GlobalNews Events

630 CHED supports Kids With Cancer Society Meet & Greet - GlobalNews Events

Come on down to the Kids with Cancer Society’s Meet and Greet! Meet the incredible Kids with Cancer Society families, learn more about fundraising, register for future Kids with Cancer events, and engage with other participants.

The free BBQ takes place June 5 from 10 am – 2 pm at Cycle Works Motorsports.

If you are a motorcyclist who is interested in riding in support of children with cancer, please contact Emily at 780-496-2459.

Posted on

Interactive web portal details the extent of splicing events in noncoding sequences

Interactive web portal details the extent of splicing events in noncoding sequences

An online tool reveals the extent of gene-restructuring events in noncoding sequences.

An interactive web portal developed by scientists at KAUST offers a platform for cancer researchers to interrogate how RNA splicing in noncoding parts of genes fuels the growth of different types of tumors.

The new resource, named SpUR (short for Splicing in Untranslated Regions) and freely available online, details more than 1,000 splicing events found frequently in cancers in noncoding regions of mRNA located just downstream of protein-coding stop signals. The sites and expression levels of these events are catalogued and visualized for nearly 8,000 samples across 10 cancer types and corresponding normal tissues.

With the tool, independent research teams can now further probe the role of individual splice events in cancer development and progression.

These events could become candidates to study RNA dysregulations in cancer for academic researchers. Or they could serve as a primary source for the development of RNA-based anti-cancer drugs.”


Xin Gao, acting associate director of the Computational Bioscience Research Center and deputy director of the Smart Health Initiative at KAUST

Computer scientist Gao, together with postdoc Bin Zhang and research engineer Adil Salhi, created the SpUR database in collaboration with researchers at the Cancer Science Institute of Singapore.

The research showed that splicing in downstream sequences of a gene (known as 3′ untranslated regions, or 3′ UTRs) is pervasive in cancers, especially in genes linked to tumor aggression. Consequently, patients whose cancers harbor more of these gene-restructuring events tend to have poorer survival outcomes.

As a proof of principle, the researchers designed splice-switching agents known as antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) that could block this splicing process in 3′ UTRs. When administered to liver cancer cells, these drugs helped repress tumor growth. And since the same kinds of splicing events are “ubiquitously expressed across different cancer types,” Gao notes, this type of therapeutic strategy “could be helpful to develop broad-spectrum anti-cancer drugs.”

One potential target:CTNNB1, which is a gene that provides instructions for making a protein called beta-catenin. Drug companies have long tried to target beta-catenin, given its central role in many cancer-signaling pathways, but with only limited success. The study from Gao and his collaborators showed that splicing in the 3′ UTR ofCTNNB1is widespread across cancers of the liver, breast, colon, kidney, lung and other organs, and that a spliced variant is the predominant driver of tumor progression.

In a mouse model of liver cancer, blocking this splicing resulted in complete tumor regression. An ASO therapy directed atCTNNB1splicing could therefore have broad utility in patients, and, as Gao points out, it is not likely to be the only one.

Source:

Journal reference:

Chan, J.J., et al. (2022) Pan-cancer, pervasive upregulation of 3’UTR splicing drives tumorigenesis. Nature Cell Biology. doi.org/10.1038/s41556-022-00913-z.

Posted on

Immune-Related Adverse Events in Urothelial Cancer | CMAR

Angiotensinogen and Risk of Stroke Events in Patients with Type 2 Diab | DMSO

Introduction

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has markedly changed the treatment of many types of tumors, with a subset of patients with advanced cancer, including advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC), showing improved survival.1–6 The Phase III KEYNOTE-045 study demonstrated that, in comparison to chemotherapy, pembrolizumab (a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets programmed death receptor-1 [PD-1]), significantly improved overall survival in patients who had received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced UC.5 The assessment of health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in the KEYNOTE-045 trial demonstrated that pembrolizumab increased the time to the deterioration of the HRQoL, in addition to improving or stabilizing the patient’s global health status/quality of life in comparison to chemotherapy.7 While the tolerability profile of pembrolizumab was superior to that of conventional chemotherapy, ICIs have the potential to cause various toxicities and adverse effects, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs), when normal organs are attacked as a result of immune system activation.8

Recently, several studies have reported a possible association between the incidence of irAEs and the clinical efficacy of ICIs in patients with melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer.8–10 Also in UC, a relationship between irAEs and the outcomes of ICIs has been reported; however, few of these studies have investigated UC and the relationship remains unclear.11,12 Furthermore, a number of clinical biomarkers of the response to ICIs have been reported for advanced UC,13–16 and we previously reported that an increased relative eosinophil count (REC) after three weeks of pembrolizumab treatment may be associated with improved clinical outcomes.17 However, it is still unclear whether an increased REC would cause increased numbers of irAEs or specific irAEs.

In the present study, we retrospectively investigated the association between irAEs and oncological outcomes, and whether an increased REC is associated with increased irAEs or any specific irAEs in advanced UC patients treated with pembrolizumab.

Materials and Methods

Patients

The records of advanced UC patients who received pembrolizumab treatment after disease progression on platinum-based chemotherapy from January 2018 to June 2021 were analyzed. The patients were managed at 6 institutions. Pembrolizumab was administered intravenously at a fixed dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks, until the occurrence of disease progression or adverse events that were deemed unacceptable. Computed tomography was generally performed before treatment and after every 4–6 treatment cycles, or when it was deemed to be clinically necessary. We evaluated the tumor response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1.18 As reported previously,19,20 the peripheral REC was measured at the same time as complete blood count measurements: before treatment and at three weeks after the start of pembrolizumab treatment. The patients’ clinical information and follow-up data were obtained from their medical records. The grades of irAEs were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.21 irAEs were categorized as skin, endocrine, gastrointestinal, respiratory, hepatobiliary and other disorders. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before their inclusion in this study. The present retrospective study was approved by the National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center Institutional Review Board (approval no. 2020–90) and the ethics committee of each institution.

Statistical Analyses

An increased REC was defined as an increased REC at 3 weeks after the initial pembrolizumab treatment in comparison to the pretreatment REC. A decreased REC was defined as a decreased or unchanged REC at 3 weeks after initial pembrolizumab treatment in comparison to the pretreatment REC. The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of pembrolizumab-treated patients who showed a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR). Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the association between the ORR and the incidence of overall and individual irAEs, and to analyze the differences in overall and individual irAEs between the increased REC and decreased REC groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the start of pembrolizumab treatment until the date of disease progression or death. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the start of pembrolizumab until death from any cause. PFS and OS curves were determined by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by a Log rank test. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). P values of <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP® Pro (version 15.1.0, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Patient Characteristics

During the study period, 125 patients with advanced UC received pembrolizumab after disease progression on platinum-based chemotherapy. The patients were managed at 6 institutions. After the exclusion of 20 patients due to missing clinical data, 105 patients were included in the analysis (Table 1). The median age of the patients was 72 years (interquartile range [IQR], 67–77 years), and 75 (71.4%) patients were men. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) was 0 in 64 patients (61.0%) and ≥1 in 41 patients (39.0%). A histological analysis demonstrated pure transitional cell features in 85 (81.0%) patients. The locations of the tumor included the bladder in 42 patients (40.0%), the upper urinary tract in 41 patients (39.0%), and both bladder and upper urinary tract in 22 patients (21.0%). Visceral metastasis was present in 61 patients (58.1%), and liver metastasis was present in 19 patients (18.1%). Pembrolizumab was administered as a second-line treatment to 84 patients (80.0%). The evaluation of the change in REC at 3 weeks after the initiation of pembrolizumab revealed an increased REC in 65 (61.9%) patients. irAEs of any grade occurred in 34 patients (32.4%), with grade ≥3 irAEs occurring in 11 patients (10.5%). The ORR was 36.2% (n=38).

Table 1 Patient Characteristics

Profiles of irAEs in Patients Treated with Pembrolizumab

The profile of the irAEs is shown in Table 2. Overall irAEs occurred in 34 (32.4%) patients; 11 (10.5%) patients experienced severed irAEs (grade ≥3). Skin-related (n=15) and endocrine system-related (n=11) irAEs were the most common types of any-grade irAEs. Grade ≥3 irAEs included gastrointestinal disorder (n=3), respiratory disorder (n=3), endocrine disorder (n=2), skin disorder (n=1), myositis (n=1), and myocarditis (n=1).

Table 2 Types of Immune-Related Adverse Events (Any-Grade and Grade≥3)

Association Between the ORR and irAEs and Between the ORR and the Change of the REC in Patients Treated with Pembrolizumab

The ORR was 36.2%, with CR and PR rates of 4.8% and 31.4%, respectively. The ORR of patients with any-grade irAEs was significantly higher than that of patients without irAEs (58.8% vs 25.4%, P=0.001). However, the ORR of patients with and without grade ≥3 irAEs did not (36.4% vs 36.2%, P=1.000). The ORR was significantly higher in patients with an increased post-treatment REC in comparison to patients with a decreased post-treatment REC (44.6% vs 22.5%, P=0.024) (Table 3).

Table 3 Association Between Immune-Related Adverse Events and the Objective Response Rate and Between Immune-Related Adverse Events and the Increased Post-Treatment Relative Eosinophil Count

Association Between irAEs and Post-Treatment (Three Weeks Later) REC Changes in Patients Treated with Pembrolizumab

There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of irAEs of any grade between patients with an increased post-treatment REC and those with a decreased post-treatment REC (32.3% vs 32.5%, P=1.000). Regarding the individual irAEs in patients with an increased post-treatment REC and those with a decreased post-treatment REC, there were no significant differences in the rates of skin (18.5% vs 7.5%, P=0.156), endocrine (7.7% vs 15.0%, P=0.326), gastrointestinal (4.6% vs 10.0%, P=0.423), respiratory (4.6% vs 2.5%, P=1.000), or hepatobiliary (0% vs 5.0%, P=0.143) irAEs. There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of grade ≥3 irAEs between patients with an increased post-treatment REC and those with a decreased post-treatment REC (10.8% vs 10.0%, P=1.000) (Table 4).

Table 4 Association Between the Incidence of Immune-Related Adverse Events and the Change in the Post-Treatment Relative Eosinophil Count

Association Between irAEs and Survival in Patients Treated with Pembrolizumab

During a median follow-up period of 8.4 months (IQR, 4.1−15.7 months), the median PFS and OS were 3.3 months (IQR, 2.8–5.5) and 13.7 months (IQR, 10.2–19.8), respectively. PFS was significantly associated with the occurrence of any-grade irAEs (25.1 months vs 3.1 months, P<0.001, Figure 1A), but not with the occurrence of grade ≥3 irAEs (9.5 vs 5.5 months, P=0.249, Figure 1B). Similarly, OS was significantly associated with the occurrence of any-grade irAEs (31.2 months vs 11.5 months, P<0.001, Figure 2A), but not with the occurrence of grade ≥3 irAEs (not reached vs 13.7 months, P=0335, Figure 2B).

Figure 1 Progression-free survival according to the occurrence of any-grade (A) and grade≥3 (B) immune-related adverse events.

Figure 2 Overall survival according to the occurrence of any-grade (A) and grade≥3 (B) immune-related adverse events.

Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of OS in Pembrolizumab-Treated Patients

Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors (Table 5). In the multivariate analyses, female sex (hazard ratio [HR] 2.274, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.278–4.048, P=0.005), ECOG PS ≥1 (HR 1.975, 95% CI: 1.095–3.561, P=0.024), albumin <3.7 g/dl (HR 3.377, 95% CI: 1.816–6.281, P<0.001), decreased post-treatment REC (at 3 weeks after the initiation of treatment) (HR 3.073, 95% CI: 1.775–5.318, P<0.001), and the absence of any-grade irAEs (HR 2.885, 95% CI: 1.465–5.683, P=0.002) were independently associated with decreased OS.

Table 5 Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Factors Associated with Overall Survival in Pembrolizumab-Treated Patients

Discussion

In the present study, the relationship between irAEs and the clinical outcomes, and the relationship between the occurrence of irAEs and the change in the REC were retrospectively evaluated in advanced UC patients who received pembrolizumab after disease progression during treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy. The present study revealed that irAEs of any grade were associated with a significantly higher ORR, longer PFS, and longer OS in comparison to patients without irAEs. Moreover, an increased REC at 3 weeks after the initiation of pembrolizumab therapy did not result in the numbers of irAEs or in the occurrence of specific irAEs. Our results revealed a strong association between the incidence of irAEs and the clinical efficacy of pembrolizumab. Furthermore, an increased REC after the initiation of treatment could be a predictive marker for improved clinical outcomes and did not have a significant relationship with an increase in the number of irAEs or in the occurrence of specific irAEs in advanced UC patients who received pembrolizumab subsequent to platinum-based chemotherapy.

Although ICI therapy is associated with significantly improved outcomes in patients with various malignancies, including advanced UC, they have the potential to induce irAEs, which may limit their application. The exact mechanisms that underlie the development of irAEs remain to be fully uncovered; however, in an association between the development of irAEs and improved outcomes has been reported in patients who receive ICI therapy for various types of cancer, including melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer.22–25 irAEs have been reported to be associated with improved clinical efficacy in UC who receive ICI therapy; however, few studies have investigated this phenomenon.11,12,14 In the present study, the multivariate analysis demonstrated that the absence of any-grade irAEs was independently associated with worse OS (HR 2.885, P=0.002). Thus, in line with previous studies that investigated the use of ICIs in various types of cancer, the results of the present study support an association between the occurrence of irAEs and the clinical efficacy of ICI therapy in UC patients.

Although the present study confirmed an association between any-grade irAEs and the clinical efficacy of pembrolizumab, this association was not confirmed for grade ≥3 irAEs. In patients who received nivolumab monotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, the PFS of patients with irAEs was reported to be longer in comparison to patients without irAEs regardless of the severity of their irAEs (grade ≥3 vs no irAEs; P=0.0023; grade <3 vs no irAEs: P=0.0024). Furthermore, the incidence of grade <3 irAEs rather than grade ≥3 was associated with longer OS (grade <3 vs no irAEs: P=0.0124; grade ≥3 vs no irAEs: P=0.136).26 On the other hand, in patients receiving combination therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, it was reported that PFS of patients with grade ≥3 irAEs was significantly longer in comparison to patients with grade <3 irAEs (p=0.0388) or patients without irAEs (P<0.0001); however, the same association was not observed for OS.27 In patients receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy for stage III melanoma, it was reported that the occurrence of an irAE was associated with longer recurrence-free survival in the pembrolizumab arm (P=0.03), but the occurrence of a severe (grade 3–4) irAE among patients treated with pembrolizumab therapy was not significantly associated with prolonged RFS (P=0.43).28 This difference seen with regard to the grades of irAEs and the efficacy of ICI therapy may be attributable to the different ICI regimens that the patients received; that is, the presence of irAEs themselves—not necessarily severe irAEs—may be a clinical biomarker that predicts favorable outcomes in patients with advanced UC who receive pembrolizumab.

Complete blood analyses are routinely performed for patients undergoing immunotherapy and the eosinophil count can be easily measured in clinical practice. Eosinophils are a subset of granulocytic leukocytes with important roles in parasitic and allergic disease.29 Recently, eosinophils have been highlighted as potential cellular biomarkers and even end-stage effector cells in cancer therapy.30–33 Eosinophilia has also been reported to be closely associated with clinical efficacy in patients undergoing ICI therapy for melanoma,34 lung cancer,35 renal cell carcinoma,36 and classical Hodgkin lymphoma.37 Furthermore, we recently reported that an increased REC after pembrolizumab treatment was associated with superior OS in comparison to a decreased REC in advanced UC patients who received pembrolizumab therapy.17

While eosinophilia has been reported as a prognostic and predictive marker of cancer outcomes, it is also reported closely associated with irAEs. Among patients with non–small cell lung cancer who received treatment with ICIs (all patients were treated with PD-1 inhibitors either as monotherapy (44.7%) or in combination with chemotherapy or anti-angiogenesis therapy), a baseline feature of high absolute eosinophil count (≥0.125 × 109 cells/L) was associated with an increasing risk of ICI-pneumonitis, but also with a better clinical outcome.38 Another study reported that irAEs are more common in patients with peripheral eosinophilia, and that eosinophilia is significantly associated with cutaneous irAEs, advanced melanoma patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors who developed any type of cutaneous irAE showing better overall survival.39 In another study in which the majority of patients had melanoma or non-small lung cancer with ICIs (the majority received PD-1 inhibitors, but the study population also included patients treated with a cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated protein 4 [CTLA-4] inhibitor, the combination of CTLA4 and PD-1 inhibitors, and PD-L1 inhibitors), eosinophilia (≥0.5 × 109 cells/L) during treatment was found to be significantly associated with the incidence of any-grade toxicity. Severe toxicity was not associated with eosinophilia. Disease control was more likely to be achieved in patients who developed eosinophilia.40

In the present study, we also retrospectively analyzed the association between the incidence of irAEs and the change in REC after treatment with a PD-1 inhibitor (pembrolizumab) and observed that an increased post-treatment REC at 3 weeks was not associated with an increased number of irAEs or specific irAEs including respiratory disorder and skin-related irAEs. Differences in various factors, including the type of cancer, type of ICI, timing of measurement of the REC, and ethnicity, may have led to differences in the clinical outcomes of the present study and previous studies. Given that our previous report suggested that an increased post-treatment REC (3 weeks later) was an independent prognostic factor for better OS, an increased REC after treatment could be an early predictor of improved clinical outcomes but is not associated with an increased number of irAEs or specific irAEs in patients with advanced UC who receive pembrolizumab.

The present study was associated with some limitations. First, this retrospective study had a relatively small study population; thus, there may have been a selection bias. Second, this was a multi-institutional study, and the patients were not enrolled in clinical trials; thus, there was heterogeneity in the regimens and lines of systemic chemotherapy that the patients had received, and in the evaluation and management of irAEs. Prospective studies with larger cohorts and a long follow-up period are necessary to confirm the findings of the present study.

Conclusion

In patients with advanced UC who received pembrolizumab after platinum-based chemotherapy, the incidence of irAEs was associated with a significantly higher ORR, longer PFS, and longer OS in comparison to patients without irAEs. An increased posttreatment REC could also be a marker to predict improved clinical outcomes and did not have a significant relationship with the incidence of irAEs.

Abbreviations

ICIs, immune checkpoint inhibitors; UC, urothelial carcinoma; PD-1, programmed death receptor-1; irAEs, immune-related adverse events; REC, relative eosinophil counts; ORR, objective response rate; PFS, progression‑free survival; OS, overall survival; IQR, interquartile range; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated protein 4.

Ethics Approval

This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center (2020-90). This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Acknowledgments

We thank Japan Medical Communication (https://www.japan-mc.co.jp/) for editing the English language of the present manuscript.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

There is no funding to report.

Disclosure

The authors report no financial disclosures or potential conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(14):1345–1356. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1709684

2. Antonia S, Villegas A, Danie D, et al. Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(20):1919–1929. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1709937

3. Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(17):1627–1639. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1507643

4. Overman MJ, McDermott R, Leach JL, et al. Nivolumab in patients with metastatic DNA mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer (CheckMate 142): an open-label, multicentre, Phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(9):1182–1191. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30422-9

5. Bellmunt J, Wit RD, Vaughn DJ, et al. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(11):1015–1026. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1613683

6. Powles T, Park SH, Voog E, et al. Avelumab maintenance therapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(13):1218–1230. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2002788

7. Vaughn DJ, Bellmunt J, Fradet Y, et al. Health-related quality-of-life analysis from KEYNOTE-045: a phase III study of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for previously treated advanced urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(16):1579–1587. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.76.9562

8. Freeman-Keller M, Kim Y, Cronin H, et al. Nivolumab in resected and unresectable metastatic melanoma: characteristics of immune-related adverse events and association with outcomes. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(4):886–894. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1136

9. Haratani K, Hayashi H, Chiba Y, et al. Association of immune-related adverse events with nivolumab efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(3):374–378. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.2925

10. Sato K, Akamatsu H, Murakami E, et al. Correlation between immune-related adverse events and efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab. Lung Cancer. 2018;115:71–74. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.11.019

11. Kobayashi K, Suzuki K, Hiraide M, et al. Association of immune-related adverse events with pembrolizumab efficacy in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Oncology. 2020;98(4):237–242. doi:10.1159/000505340

12. Kijima T, Fukushima H, Kusuhara S, et al. Association between the occurrence and spectrum of immune-related adverse events and efficacy of pembrolizumab in asian patients with advanced urothelial cancer: multicenter retrospective analyses and systematic literature review. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021;19(3):208–216.e1. doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2020.07.003

13. Sacdalan DB, Lucero JA, Sacdalan DL. Prognostic utility of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a review and meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:955–965. doi:10.2147/OTT.S153290

14. Kawai T, Sato Y, Makino K, et al. Immune-related adverse events predict the therapeutic efficacy of pembrolizumab in urothelial cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2019;116:114–115. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.017

15. Yasuoka S, Yuasa T, Nishimura N, et al. Initial experience of pembrolizumab therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. Anticancer Res. 2019;39(7):3887–3892. doi:10.21873/anticanres.13539

16. Ogihara K, Kikuchi E, Shigeta K, et al. The pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a novel biomarker for predicting clinical responses to pembrolizumab in platinum-resistant metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients. Urol Oncol. 2020;38(6):602.e1–602.e10. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.02.005

17. Furubayashi N, Minato A, Negishi T, et al. The association of clinical outcomes with posttreatment changes in the relative eosinophil counts and neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:8049–8056. doi:10.2147/CMAR.S333823

18. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–247. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026

19. Ohashi H, Takeuchi S, Miyagaki T, et al. Increase of lymphocytes and eosinophils, and decrease of neutrophils at an early stage of anti-PD-1 antibody treatment is a favorable sign for advanced malignant melanoma. Drug Discov Ther. 2020;14(3):117–121. doi:10.5582/ddt.2020.03043

20. Mota JM, Teo MY, Whiting K, et al. Pretreatment eosinophil counts in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother. 2021;44(7):248–253. doi:10.1097/CJI.0000000000000372

21. US Department of Health and Human Services. NIoH, National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0; 2017 Available from: https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_8.5×11.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2021.

22. Cortellini A, Chiari R, Ricciuti B, et al. Correlations between the immune-related adverse events spectrum and efficacy of anti-PD1 immunotherapy in NSCLC patients. Clin Lung Cancer. 2019;20(4):237–247.e1. doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2019.02.006

23. Bisschop C, Wind TT, Blank CU, et al. Association between pembrolizumab-related adverse events and treatment outcome in advanced melanoma: results from the Dutch expanded access program. J Immunother. 2019;42(6):208–214. doi:10.1097/CJI.0000000000000271

24. Horvat TZ, Adel NG, Dang TO, et al. Immune-related adverse events, need for systemic immunosuppression, and effects on survival and time to treatment failure in patients with melanoma treated with ipilimumab at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(28):3193–3198. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8448

25. Toi Y, Sugawara S, Kawashima Y, et al. Association of immune-related adverse events with clinical benefit in patients with advanced non-small-cell Lung cancer treated with nivolumab. Oncologist. 2018;23(11):1358–1365. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0384

26. Ishihara H, Takagi T, Kondo T, et al. Association between immune-related adverse events and prognosis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab. Urol Oncol. 2019;37(6):355.e21–355.e29. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.03.003

27. Ikeda T, Ishihara H, Nemoto Y, et al. Prognostic impact of immune-related adverse events in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Urol Oncol. 2021;39(10):735.e9–735.e16. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.05.012

28. Eggermont AM, Kicinski M, Blank CU, et al. Association between immune-related adverse events and recurrence-free survival among patients with stage III melanoma randomized to receive pembrolizumab or placebo: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(4):519–527. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.5570

29. Simon SC, Utikal J, Umansky V. Opposing roles of eosinophils in cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2019;68(5):823–833. doi:10.1007/s00262-018-2255-4

30. Simon HU, Plötz S, Simon D, et al. Interleukin-2 primes eosinophil degranulation in hypereosinophilia and Wells’ syndrome. Eur J Immunol. 2003;33(4):834–839. doi:10.1002/eji.200323727

31. Sosman JA, Bartemes K, Offord KP, et al. Evidence for eosinophil activation in cancer patients receiving recombinant interleukin-4: effects of interleukin-4 alone and following interleukin-2 administration. Clin Cancer Res. 1995;1(8):805–812.

32. Ellem KA, O’Rourke MG, Johnson GR, et al. A case report: immune responses and clinical course of the first human use of granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating-factor-transduced autologous melanoma cells for immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1997;44(1):10–20. doi:10.1007/s002620050349

33. Gebhardt C, Sevko A, Jiang H, et al. Myeloid cells and related chronic inflammatory factors as novel predictive markers in melanoma treatment with Ipilimumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(24):5453–5459. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0676

34. Weide B, Martens A, Hassel JC, et al. Baseline biomarkers for outcome of melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(22):5487–5496. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0127

35. Tanizaki J, Haratani K, Hayashi H, et al. Peripheral blood biomarkers associated with clinical outcome in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13(1):97–105. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2017.10.030

36. Zahoor H, Barata PC, Jia X, et al. Patterns, predictors and subsequent outcomes of disease progression in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6(1):107. doi:10.1186/s40425-018-0425-8

37. Hude I, Sasse S, Bröckelmann PJ, et al. Leucocyte and eosinophil counts predict progression-free survival in relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin Lymphoma patients treated with PD1 inhibition. Br J Haematol. 2018;181(6):837–840. doi:10.1111/bjh.14705

38. Chu X, Zhao J, Zhou J, et al. Association of baseline peripheral-blood eosinophil count with immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis and clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Lung Cancer. 2020;150:76–82. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.08.015

39. Bottlaender L, Amini‑Adle M, Maucort‑Boulch D, et al. Cutaneous adverse events: a predictor of tumour response under anti‑PD‑1 therapy for metastatic melanoma, a cohort analysis of 189 patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(9):2096–2105. doi:10.1111/jdv.16311

40. Krishnan T, Tomita Y, Roberts-Thomson R, et al. A retrospective analysis of eosinophilia as a predictive marker of response and toxicity to cancer immunotherapy. Future Sci OA. 2020;6(10):FSO608. doi:10.2144/fsoa-2020-0070

Posted on

What are the commercial determinants of cancer control policy? Launch of Eurohealth special edition and webinar discussion

What are the commercial determinants of cancer control policy? Launch of Eurohealth special edition and webinar discussion

27 April 2022, 12:00–13:00 Central European Summer Time (virtual event)

Cancer is a major health, social and public policy challenge and successfully tackling it requires an understanding of all its determinants. Although commercial determinants are a relatively new field of study, there are emerging themes which are very important for cancer policy along the cancer control continuum.

Commercial determinants are those private-sector activities that affect the health of populations. They can have a negative impact, as commercial interests can trump nobler health goals.

So, how do commercial determinants affect cancer control policies in Europe? What are the challenges and opportunities for governing them along the cancer control continuum? Join our webinar to learn more.

Prevalence of cancer in the European Region

Cancer is responsible for a high burden of disease within the WHO European Region. In 2020 alone, 4.8 million people in the Region were diagnosed with cancer, of whom a staggering 2.2 million people lost their lives.

By 2030, these numbers are estimated to reach 5.4 million new diagnoses annually and 2.5 million deaths each year. Additionally, these numbers will most likely be an under estimate given the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on delayed diagnosis and treatments. If efficient prevention and early detection strategies are in place, 30–40% of cancers are preventable. This is not being achieved due to cancer policy-making remaining quite far from what evidence and cost–effectiveness recommends, with treatment often being prioritized over prevention and early detection strategies, for example.

Cancer policy-making also differs significantly across the European Region, contributing to the widening of health inequalities within and between countries. Action on cancer prevention and control is a key priority to curb the burden of disease within the population of the European Region and to achieve the Sustainable Development Goal target to reduce by one third premature mortality from noncommunicable diseases by 2030.

Keynote speakers

  • Marilys Corbex, WHO Regional Office for Europe
  • Monika Kosinska, WHO headquarters

Speakers

  • Gauden Galea, WHO Representative Office in China
  • Stuart Hogarth, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Richard Sullivan, King’s College London, United Kingdom

Moderators

  • Matthias Wismar and Erica Richardson, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

This event is intended for policy-makers, advisors, national experts, medical and health-care professionals, members of professional societies, researchers, advocates and representatives of nongovernmental organizations.

Posted on

Peterborough Dragon Boat Festival returns with in-person event on June 11

Peterborough Dragon Boat Festival returns with in-person event on June 11

The Peterborough Dragon Boat Festival will return to Little Lake and Del Crary Park on June 11 after not being held in-person for the past two years due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Registration will open at 12:01 a.m. on Friday at ptbodragonboat.ca.

It’s the 21st edition of the event, which raises funds for the Peterborough Regional Health Centre Foundation in support of cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment.

It was cancelled in 2020 and held virtually last year, raising more than $95,000. COVID-19 protocols based on local and provincial guidelines will be in place.

“We are committed to creating a safe, comfortable and enjoyable experience for all attendees and we have been working hard to update our safety protocols,” festival chair Michelle Thornton stated in a release.

A “fundracing” division will be set up for teams or people who are unable to participate in person.

“Proceeds of the 2022 Festival will allow Peterborough Regional Health Centre to invest in new state-of-the-art equipment and technology to serve more cancer patients, support earlier cancer diagnosis, and provide safer, more effective treatments,” said PRHC Foundation president and CEO Lesley Heighway.

Planned amenities for race day include the One Stop Dragon Boat Shop, a Family Fun Zone, the Dragon’s Lair, Loft and Nest luxurious tent experience for the top three fundraising teams, the Vendor Village Market with more than 40 vendors, the Thirsty Dragon beer garden and the flower ceremony open to the community at large to honour their loved ones.

The first three teams to register will win a free extra practice in a dragon boat on Little Lake.

Posted on

Checkpoint Inhibitors Present Unique Adverse Events, Require Careful Management Strategies in Breast Cancer

Checkpoint Inhibitors Present Unique Adverse Events, Require Careful Management Strategies in Breast Cancer

Most, but not all, immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAE) occur throughout the first 12 weeks of treatment, and can affect any organ, according to La-Urshala Brock, FNP-BC, CNM, RNF, a clinical instructor specializing in breast and gynecologic cancers at the Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing with Emory University.1

Brock recently presented during the 39th Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® about immunotherapy-related adverse event management, in a lecture titled, “Immunotherapy Adverse Effects,” which focused specifically on toxicities associated with pembrolizumab (Keytruda).

In July 2021, the PD-L1 inhibitor pembrolizumab was approved by the FDA to treat patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the neoadjuvant meeting in conjunction with chemotherapy, to be continued as an adjuvant monotherapy after surgery.2

The approval for pembrolizumab was supported by findings from the randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled KEYNOTE-522 trial (NCT03036488).3 Results demonstrated a 37% reduction in the risk of disease progression that precluded definitive surgery, a local/distant recurrence, a second primary cancer, or death from any cause (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.82; P = .00031).The recommended dose for intravenous pembrolizumab is 200 mg every 3 weeks.2

Notably, this approval also marked the first immunotherapy to treat patients with high-risk early-stage TNBC. However, the introduction of the agent also opens the door for more toxicity management education for nurses who care for patient with breast cancer.

“Immunotherapies present with a novel spectrum of AEs that differ in important ways from those associated with chemotherapy and targeted agents,” said Brock. “When you’re using immunotherapy, truly any organ can be affected. The median onset is 4 to 5 weeks [after beginning treatment], but adverse events can happen as early as when you start the treatment.”

Atezolizumab (Tecentriq), a PD-L1 inhibitor, was granted accelerated approval for TNBC to be given every 3 weeks with weekly nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane) in 2019, but this agent was withdrawn from market, since it was not shown to improve survival in patients with locally unresectable metastatic, PD-L1–positive disease.4

In her discussion, Brock highlighted a wide range of toxicities that are associated with immune checkpoint inhibitiors (ICI)—particularly for patients with TNBC receiving pembrolizumab. Toxicities of interest include dermatitis, endocrine effects, adrenal insufficiencies, lung effects, colitis, hepatotoxicity, and ocular side effects, in addition to a couple rarer immune-related AEs (irAEs).

Dermatitis

ICIs may induce low-grade rashes in many patients. This can include reticular erythema, papules, and plaques. In more rare cases, Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis, palmar–planta dysesthesia may also occur.

Effective management of skin-related toxicities involve frequent photo documentation of the toxicity and follow-up photos to track potential changes, as well as consulting a dermatologist to obtain a biopsy. For low-grade toxicities, symptomatic treatment with antihistamines typically prove to be effective. However, for high-grade toxicities, treatment with topical or oral steroids may be appropriate. In addition, if symptoms progress to grade 3, treatment should be withheld, and if symptoms worsen to grade 4, treatment should be discontinued.5,6,7,8

“We hold at this point,” said Brock. “You could think about using rituximab [Rituxan] for treatment. You want to continue steroids until the blisters have resolved completely and then [once] the blisters have resolved, you want to slowly taper the steroids.”

Endocrine Toxicities

Endocrine toxicities occur in approximately 10% of patients receiving pembrolizumab. Nurses should watch for vision changes, weight gain or weight loss, dizziness, constant chilliness or feeling cold, constipation, and hair loss. Other signs of endocrine toxicities include increased headaches or changes in headache patterns, increased heartbeat, increased urination, increased tiredness, increased thirst or appetite, changes in mood, and increased sweating.8

Patients suspected to be experiencing these toxicities should have their thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) checked every 4 to 6 weeks with complete blood count (CBC) and comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP).

Adrenal Insufficiency

Adrenal insufficiency, or Addison’s disease, means that the adrenal glands produce insufficient amounts of the hormone cortisol, Brock explained. Signs and symptoms include extreme fatigue, darkening skin or hyperpigmentation, low blood pressure or fainting, abdominal pain, muscle or joint pain, salt craving, weight loss, depression or behavioral changes, and nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea.

For primary adrenal insufficiency, the workup should include assessing morning cortisone and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels, as well as CMP to assess sodium, glucose, potassium, and carbon dioxide.

If a patient has elevated TSH levels but normal or low FT4, then hypothyroidism is the cause. So long as the toxicity remains a grade 1 (TSH < 10 ml U/L or asymptomatic), they may continue receiving the checkpoint inhibitor with continued TSH and FT4 monitoring.

For hypophysitis, or inflammation of pituitary gland, the workup should include assessing morning cortisone as well as ACTH, TSH, FT4, testosterone in men, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estrogen in premenopausal women, and an MRI of the brain with or without contrast with pituitary cuts.

If the hypothyroidism progresses to a grade 2 (TSH > 10 mIU/L or symptomatic), the ICI should be withheld, an endocrinologist should be consulted, and a thyroid hormone supplementation should be implemented. The patients will continue to require TSH and FT4 checks every 6 weeks, but if the severity reduces to a grade 1 event, they may continue treatment.

In the event of grade 3/4 hypothyroidism, the ICI should be withheld until symptoms resolve to baseline with thyroid supplementation.

If a patient has low TSH and high, normal, or elevated FT4 levels, then this person is experiencing hyperthyroidism. As long as the toxicity remains at grade 1, they may continue receiving the ICI with continued TSH and FT4 checks every 2 to 3 weeks.

If the hyperthyroidism progresses to a grade 2, the ICI should be withheld until symptoms return to baseline and an endocrinologist should be consulted. A beta blocker might also be considered.

For grade 3/4 hyperthyroidism, the ICI will need to be withheld until symptoms resolve to baseline with thyroid supplementation. In addition, at this grade, hospitalization may be required if thyroid storm occurs. Prednisone should be considered at a dosage of 1 to 2 mg/kg daily and then put on a tapering schedule.

“With hyperthyroidism, what I want to mention here is that if someone is experiencing symptoms, we can use a beta blocker, but we also still want to be consulting endocrinology,” Brock highlighted. “One of the risk factors here when we get to grade 4 is the risk for thyroid storm. That is why it is important to have endocrinology involved.”

In less than 1% of patients, ICI-mediated endocrinopathy type 1 diabetes mellitus may occur with rapid onset anytime following therapy initiation.

Management for this toxicity involves monitoring serum glucose at baseline and prior to each cycle of ICI. An endocrinologist should be consulted, and generally, lifelong insulin therapy will be required. Once blood sugar is well controlled, the ICI therapy can be restarted.

Lung Toxicity

Pneumonitis equates to inflammation of the lung parenchyma. This irAE occurs between 0% to 10% of patients, but the odds increase when patients receive combination therapy as opposed to monotherapy, as well as if there has been previous thoracic radiation.9-11 The onset time for lung toxicity can range from 2 to 24 months, however, the median onset time is 3 months.

Cough, fever, dyspnea, and chest pain should be evaluated when monitoring for lung toxicity. Patients who experience these symptoms will need a chest x-ray and CT scan. The threshold for obtaining a CT scan of the chest and a pulmonary consultation should be low, noting that CT findings typically lag patient symptoms.

Management includes routine pulse oximetry checks in addition to potential CT scans, as well as administration of high-dose steroids, starting at 1 to 2 mg/kg daily, and tapering across 45 to 60 days. If symptoms return, the steroids may require retapering.

If within 72 to 96 hours of steroid initiation there is no symptom relief, patients should receive infliximab-axxq (Avsola) at 5 mg/kg. In most cases, the addition of immunosuppressants will help to resolve the issue.Infectious workup should include a nasal swab for potential viral pathogens, including COVID-19.

Notably, lung toxicity has been associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors but is an uncommon AE; less than 5% of patients experience this irAE, and less than 1% report high-grade lung toxicity while receiving this type of immunotherapy. In comparison, lung toxicity tends to present more in patients receiving ipilimumab (Yervoy) plus nivolumab (Opdivo), explained Brock.

Colitis

Colitis occurs in approximately 8% to 27% of patients receiving ICIs. Onset of GI toxicities typically appear about 5 to 10 weeks after treatment begins but can occur months after treatment with the ICI has stopped.

Initial workup for colitis should include CBC, CMP labs to assess TSH, c-reactive protein (CRP), HIV, hepatitis A and B; whereas interferon gamma release assay should be used to look for tuberculosis (TB). In addition, stool cultures to identify C. diff, CMB, ova, and parasites are recommended; lactoferrin should identify inflammation of digestive tracts and calprotectin can determine immune bowel disease (≤80 ug/g) vs inflammation (levels on 80 ≥ 1, 60 ug/g); and a CT scan.

At grade 1 severity, the ICI can either continue or be temporarily withheld. Providers should discuss dietary changes with their patients and review hydration strategies, and antdiarrheal administration may also be effective.

If the inflammation progresses to grade 2 level, the ICI should be withheld until symptoms return to grade 1 or less. A GI specialist should be consulted for an EGD/colonoscopy and prednisone should be administered at a dosage of 1 mg/kg daily. In addition, stools should be checked for inflammatory markers, such as lactoferrin and calprotectin. Once the symptom returns to grade 1, the steroids should be tapered across 4 to 6 weeks.

Grade 3 inflammation requires a hold on the ICI. Hospitalization may be required if there is electrolyte imbalance and dehydration. Providers should rule out CMV via colonoscopy and consult a GI specialist. Corticosteroids given at a dosage of 1 to 2 mg/kg day or infliximab at a dosage of 5 to 10 mg/kg daily should be administered.

“With colitis, there could be another rebound,” said Brock. “Someone could resolve back to a ready to a grade 1; if that occurs then, of course, we restart the steroids or increase the steroids and start again—slowly tapering once the symptoms improve.”

If the severity level reaches a grade 4, it is now life-threatening, and treatment should be discontinued permanently.

Hepatotoxicity/Immune-Mediated Hepatitis

Hepatotoxicity or immune-mediated hepatitis occurs in approximately 2% to 10% of patients receiving pembrolizumab and onset usually occurs between 6 to 12 weeks after treatment initiation. Symptoms include drowsiness, jaundice, right-sided abdominal pain, severe nausea or vomiting, increased bleeding, or bruising, decreased appetite, and abnormal liver blood tests (aspartate aminotransferase [AST], alanine transaminase [ALT], and bilirubin).

For grade 1 inflammation (AST or ASLT > upper limit of normal [ULN] to 3.0 and/or total bilirubin 1.0 ULN > 1.5 ULN), ICI treatment may continue but liver function should be monitored 1 to 2 times weekly. For grade 2 inflammation (ASR or ALT > 3.0 ULN to < 5.0 and/or total bilirubin 1.0 ULN to 3.0 ULN with symptoms), the ICI should be held until severity resolves to a grade 1.

In addition, the liver should be monitored every 3 days if the patient is symptomatic. If the symptom reaches statistical significance, after 3 to 5 days they can receive corticosteroids at a dosage of 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg daily. This will require tapering over 1 month. Lastly, any hepatoxic medication should be halted.

For grade 3 inflammation (ASR or ALT 5 x 20 x ULN and/or total bilirubin >3-10 x ULN with symptoms such as biopsy-fibrosis or cirrhosis), the ICI should be discontinued permanently, and the patient should be monitored every 1 to 2 days. Corticosteroids should be administered at a dosage of 1 to 2 mg/kg/day, and the patient should be referred to a hepatologist.

If the symptom progresses to grade 4 (ASR or ALT >20 x ULN and/or total bilirubin > 10 x ULN, with symptoms such as ascites or encephalopathy), they will need to be hospitalized with daily lab monitoring and consultation from a hepatitis. They should receive methylprednisone at a dosage of 2 mg/kg daily.

Ocular Symptoms

Ocular symptoms typically occur in less than 1% of patient receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone or in combination. Symptoms include eyelid swelling, blurred vision, double vision, or color vision changes, photophobia, painful eye movement, scotomas, proptosis or bulging eyes, and visual field changes.

If a patient appears to be experiencing an ocular toxicity, they should be referred to an ophthalmologist and receive a slit-lamp exam.

Treatment management for uveitis or inflammation of the middle of the eye, and iritis, or inflammation of the iris, are similar. For grade 1 inflammation, ICI treatment should continue but a referral to an ophthalmologist should be made. For grade 2 inflammation (anterior uveisis), the ICI should be held until ophthalmology evaluation and topical or systematic corticosteroids can be administered. These can continue once the issue resolves or returns to grade 1 and the patient resumes ICI treatment.

If symptoms progress to grade 3 (posterior uveitis), the ICI should be discontinued permanently, and systematic and topical corticosteroids should be administered. Lastly, if symptoms become grade 4, not only should the ICI be discontinued permanently, but the patient may need emergency care.

Rare irAEs

In addition, rare irAEs that may present in patients receiving ICIs include myocarditis and pericarditis; nephritis; pancreatitis; musculoskeletal toxicities such as arthritis, arthralgia, myalgia, and myositis; and neurologic toxicities such as peripheral neuropathy, myasthenia gravis, and Guillain-Barré Syndrome.

General Principles of ICI Toxicity Management

In conclusion, for grade 1 toxicities (mild or asymptomatic toxicities), the patient can continue receiving the ICI without steroids or intervention. Patients with grade 1 toxicities may benefit from antihistamines.

For grade 2 toxicities (moderate toxicities), a specialist should be consulted, and steroids should be considered. The ICI should be withheld until the symptom returns to grade 1; if the grade 2 symptoms persist for more than 12 weeks, the ICI should be discontinued.

If symptoms progress to grade 3, the ICI should be held (or, in the case of pneumonitis, discontinued), and prednisone should be administered. A specialist should be consulted, and hospitalization may become necessary. If these symptoms remain consistent, the ICI should be discontinued.

Grade 4 toxicities are life-threatening. Unless the symptom is endocrine-related, grade 4 toxicities signify that the ICI should be immediately discontinued. The patient will need hospitalization, and to continue receiving prednisone. If the steroid does not yield symptom improvement, infliximab should also be considered.

Other important considerations include using a proton pump inhibitor or H2 blocker for gastritis, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim/fluconazole for opportunistic infections, and calcium and vitamin D for osteoporosis, Brock noted.

Furthermore, counseling patients and caregivers should involve setting evidence-based expectations for benefits. Patients may have heard of the drug and have misconceptions based on popular stories in the news. It should be clear that benefits taking longer to emerge with immunotherapy compared with treatments like chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Therefore, patients with significant tumor burden or rapidly progressing disease often cannot afford to elect these types of therapies.

For nurses caring for patients beginning immunotherapy, it is essential to emphasize the importance of monitoring and promptly reporting symptoms.

“Emphasize [the importance] of monitoring and promptly reporting symptoms,” Brock urged. “[Teach them to] contact the oncology care team if [they are] experiencing any new signs or symptoms [and to] report any visits to the emergency department and other healthcare providers.”

In addition, patients should also always always carry an immunotherapy wallet. Lastly, patients need adequate irAE management education.

“Discontinuing ICIs because of AEs does not worsen survival,”12 she noted. “Treating irAEs with steroids does not worsen response or survival.”13,14 

References

  1. Brock LA. Immunotherapy adverse effects. Presented at: 39th Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference®; March 3-6, 2022; Miami Beach, FL.
  2. This Keytruda combination is the first immunotherapy regimen approved for high-risk early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). News release. Merck. July 27, 2021. Accessed March 15, 2022. https://bit.ly/3id6Rou
  3. Schmid P, Cortes J, Dent R, et al. Event-free survival with pembrolizumab in early triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(6):556-567. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2112651
  4. Roche provides update on Tecentriq US indication for PD-L1-positive, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. News release. Roche. August 27, 2021. Accessed August 27, 2021. https://bit.ly/3ypzC6K
  5. Weber JS, Postow M, Lao CD, Schadendorf D. Management of adverse events following treatment with anti-programmed death-1 agents. Oncologist. 2016;21(10):1230-1240. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0055.
  6. Haanen JBAG, Carbonnel F, Robert C, et al. Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up [published correction appears in Ann Oncol. 2018;29(suppl 4):iv264-iv266]. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(suppl_4):iv119-iv142. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx225
  7. Sanlorenzo M, Vujic I, Daud A, et al. Pembrolizumab cutaneous adverse events and their association with disease progression. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(11):1206-1212. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.1916
  8. Freeman-Keller M, Kim Y, Cronin H, Richards A, Gibney G, Weber JS. Nivolumab in resected and unresectable metastatic melanoma: characteristics of immune-related adverse events and association with outcomes. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(4):886-894. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1136
  9. NCCN guidelines for management of immunotherapy-related toxicities. NCCN. Accessed March 18, 2022. https://bit.ly/34TwdEN
  10. Haanen JBAG, Carbonnel F, Robert C, et al. Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up [published correction appears in Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv264-iv266]. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(suppl_4):iv119-iv142. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx225
  11. Chen X, Zhang Z, Hou X, et al. Immune-related pneumonitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer: a network meta-analysis. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(2):e001170. doi:10.1136/jitc-2020-001170
  12. Harbeck, N. Immunotherapy in TNBC: rationale and current clinical standards. Clinic Care Options Oncology. Accessed March 18, 2022. https://bit.ly/3MYh1rf
  13. Brahmer JR, Laccheti C, Schneider BJ, et al. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(17):1714-1768. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385
  14. Emens, LA, Adams S, Cimino-Matthews A, et al. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guidelines on immunotherapy for the treatment of breast cancver. J Immunother Cancer. 2021; 9(8):e002597. doi:10.1136/jitc-2021-002597
Posted on

New cancer diagnosis associated with risk for fatal, nonfatal cardiovascular events

hemonc today logo

March 15, 2022

3 min read

Disclosures:
Paterson reports no relevant financial disclosures. Please see the study for all other authors’ relevant disclosures. Ohtsu and colleagues report no relevant financial disclosures.


We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

New cancer diagnosis appeared associated with increased risk for cardiovascular death, as well as incident heart failure, stroke or pulmonary embolism, according to a retrospective cohort study published in JACC: CardioOncology.

“This risk persisted to at least 7 years from cancer diagnosis and appeared most pronounced in patients with hematologic, gastrointestinal, genitourinary and thoracic malignancies,” D. Ian Paterson, MD, FRCPC, professor of medicine in the division of cardiology, director of the Edmonton Cardio-Oncology Program and director of academic and research cardiac MRI at University of Alberta, told Healio.

HRs among patients with vs. without new cancer diagnosis
Data derived from Paterson DI, et al. JACC CardioOncol. 2022;doi:10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.01.100.

Background and methodology

Paterson and colleagues pursued the research because, despite the knowledge that patients with cancer and cancer survivors are at increased risk for heart failure, previous data conflicted regarding long-term risk for other cardiovascular events, as well as risk according to cancer site.

“Population studies to date have largely evaluated the risk [for] cardiovascular disease — and usually only heart failure — in patients with breast cancer,” Paterson said. “We performed a comprehensive analysis of the risk [for] incident cardiovascular disease in patients with a new cancer diagnosis of any type.”

D. Ian Paterson, MD, FRCPC

D. Ian Paterson

The analysis included 4,519,243 adults who resided in Alberta, Canada, from April 2007 to December 2018. Among them, 224,016 (median age, 56 years; range, 43-67; 56.8% women) had a new cancer diagnosis and 4,295,227 (median age, 34 years; range, 23-49; 48.5% women) comprised the control population.

Paterson and colleagues used time-to-event survival models, after adjusting for comorbidities and sociodemographic factors, to compare the two cohorts with respect to risk for subsequent cardiovascular events, which included cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure and pulmonary embolism.

Determining the impact of new cancer diagnosis on risk for fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events served as the primary outcome.

Key findings

At median follow-up of 11.8 years, results showed 73,360 cardiovascular deaths and 470,481 nonfatal cardiovascular events. After adjustment, researchers reported participants with cancer demonstrated the following HRs compared with participants without cancer:

1.33 (95% CI, 1.29-1.37) for cardiovascular mortality;

1.01 (95% CI, 0.97-1.05) for myocardial infarction;

1.44 (95% CI, 1.41-1.47) for stroke;

1.62 (95% CI, 1.59-1.65) for heart failure; and

3.43 (95% CI, 3.37-3.5) for pulmonary embolism.

Additionally, patients with genitourinary, gastrointestinal, thoracic, neurologic and hematologic malignancies demonstrated the highest cardiovascular risk.

“We were surprised that the risk [for] incident cardiovascular disease remained elevated in patients with cancer, even after fully adjusted risk modeling,” Paterson told Healio. “This suggests that the cancer itself, cancer therapies and/or other less traditional risk factors, such as physical activity and body composition, may have also contributed to cardiovascular risk.”

Implications

Paterson and colleagues wrote that future studies should investigate other potential contributors to cardiovascular risk, including cancer therapies and emerging risk factors for cardiotoxicity.

“We would like to identify effective intervention strategies to mitigate cardiovascular risk in patients with cancer, especially in the higher-risk cancer types (eg, hematologic),” Paterson said.

Paterson noted that as life expectancy of patients with cancer increases, so does their likelihood of developing other illnesses after diagnosis, necessitating a more collaborative approach to their health care. The authors of a corresponding editorial concurred.

“Perhaps the lesson we need to learn from [this study] is that it is time for cardiology and oncology to collaborate in order to travel upstream and build a powerhouse to generate information from the new flow of data efficiently,” Hiroshi Ohtsu, MS, manager of clinical epidemiology and director of JCRAC data center at National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Center for Clinical Sciences in Japan, and colleagues wrote.

“Cardiology and oncology need to collaborate to launch and successfully execute projects to establish new techniques to use real-world data for real-world evidence,” they added.

Reference s :

For more information:

D. Ian Paterson, MD, FRCPC, can be reached at Division of Cardiology, University of Alberta, 8440 112 St., 2C2.43 WCM, Edmonton, Alberta T6G2B7, Canada; email: ip3@ualberta.ca.